Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-20 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18.36 17/06/2005, you wrote: Hi Tonino, thanks for answering. Documentation says it works with ezmlm and mailman. Please, read the documentation! Tonino Dude, let me tell you: I ran a 'find ezmlm' in your whole website and the only matches I found were these statements (shown bellow) expl

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Friday 17 June 2005 19:56, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > On Friday 17 June 2005 15:47, Bruno Negrão wrote: > > > Documentation is wrong (I'll correct it soon): '.' and '=' > > > are accepted in format controls. > > Sorry I didn't read this message before my last reply asking > about this... > > > G

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Friday 17 June 2005 15:47, Bruno Negrão wrote: > > Documentation is wrong (I'll correct it soon): '.' and '=' are > > accepted in format controls. Sorry I didn't read this message before my last reply asking about this... > Guys, with the "valid characters" now being: > user= [a-z0-

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Bruno Negrão
No .??? We have many users who opt for addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tonino (chkuser developer) said that "." and "=" are being allowed and the documentation is outdated. But, despite of this, the main function of chkuser, that is, checking user existence before accepting any e-mail is per

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Friday 17 June 2005 13:43, Bruno Negrão wrote: > a.. CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT: checks if the SENDER of each message > has the username part matching [a-z0-9_-] No .??? We have many users who opt for addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, -- Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info [EMAI

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Bruno Negrão
Thanks Matt, I removed that part from the document. I let this for the experienced administrators to try by themselves. Bruno - Original Message - From: "Matt Brookings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 3:52 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Help

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | | Also, I'm not asking about just ezmlm and mailman lists. Maybe there are | other mailing lists or mail mechanisms that require not common | characters on the RCPT and/or SENDER addresses. If I remember correctly, the RFCs state that any alphanum

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Bruno Negrão
Hi Tonino, thanks for answering. Documentation says it works with ezmlm and mailman. Please, read the documentation! Tonino Dude, let me tell you: I ran a 'find ezmlm' in your whole website and the only matches I found were these statements (shown bellow) explaining about settings inside chk

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 16.47 17/06/2005, you wrote: Tonino, are these characters enough even in those cases when somebody wants to, for example, send a confirmation reply e-mail to some automatic procedure? Like, confirming a subscribe message for a mailing list or something like that. How were your tests? Docu

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 17 June 2005 08:43 am, Bruno Negrão wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm editing my Simscan + ClamAV + Chkuser installation guide at: > http://www.qmailwiki.org/Simscan/Related_Docs/Simscan_ClamAV_Chkuser_Instal >lation_Guide > > And I added a new part where I persuade the reader to enable some of >

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bruno_Negr=E3o?=
But now I looking closely to this check I'm recalling some of my customers like to have e-mails of the format: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I't seems that this check would block my usernames with the 'user.lastname' syntax, since it doesn't accept a '.' character in the USER part. Is this customizable? If

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Negrão wrote: | Hi Matt, thanks for answering. | |> | a.. CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT: checks if the SENDER of each message has |> the |> | username part matching [a-z0-9_-], and the domain part matching |> | [a-z0-9-.] with not consecutive "-.", not

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 15.49 17/06/2005, you wrote: But now I looking closely to this check I'm recalling some of my customers like to have e-mails of the format: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I't seems that this check would block my usernames with the 'user.lastname' syntax, since it doesn't accept a '.' character in the US

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bruno_Negr=E3o?=
Hi Matt, thanks for answering. | a.. CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT: checks if the SENDER of each message has the | username part matching [a-z0-9_-], and the domain part matching | [a-z0-9-.] with not consecutive "-.", not leading or ending "-." ==> | Great for identifying spam. This really doesn't do

Re: [vchkpw] Help with my Chkuser Installation Guide

2005-06-17 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Negrão wrote: | a.. CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT: checks if the SENDER of each message has the | username part matching [a-z0-9_-], and the domain part matching | [a-z0-9-.] with not consecutive "-.", not leading or ending "-." ==> | Great for identif