Re: [vchkpw] Backfill patch

2009-01-15 Thread Remo Mattei
Well I used courier since 1998 and then I switched a few years ago and the speed is noticeble Just my 2 cents Inviato da iPhone Il giorno 15/gen/09, alle ore 20:15, Manvendra Bhangui > ha scritto: On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Shane Chrisp wrote: Not having a go at the excellent work

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill patch

2009-01-15 Thread Manvendra Bhangui
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Shane Chrisp wrote: > Not having a go at the excellent work that's been done, but I don't know > why anyone would want to run courier these days when Dovecot runs so much > faster and uses so much less in the way of system resources. I use courier imap for few

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill patch

2009-01-15 Thread Remo Mattei
I agree with shane here Remo Inviato da iPhone Il giorno 15/gen/09, alle ore 18:06, Shane Chrisp ha scritto: Matt Brookings wrote: This patch also includes a Courier-IMAP vpopmail authentication module. Not having a go at the excellent work that's been done, but I don't know why any

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill patch

2009-01-15 Thread Shane Chrisp
Matt Brookings wrote: This patch also includes a Courier-IMAP vpopmail authentication module. Not having a go at the excellent work that's been done, but I don't know why anyone would want to run courier these days when Dovecot runs so much faster and uses so much less in the way of system r

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill Patch for dir_control

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manvendra Bhangui wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Matt Brookings > wrote: > > Does your patch take into account that dir_control is occasionally > inside a > database, or does it only work with the CDB ba

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill Patch for dir_control

2009-01-14 Thread Manvendra Bhangui
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Matt Brookings wrote: > Does your patch take into account that dir_control is occasionally inside a > database, or does it only work with the CDB backend? It's okay if it > doesn't > yet, but we definitely need it to in the future. The patch uses the dir_contro

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill Patch for dir_control

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Brookings wrote: > $ export CVSROOT=:pserver:vpopmail.cvs.sourceforge.net/cvsroot/vpopmail > $ cvs co vpopmail > > Generate a patch off that please. Actually, no need. Works fine on the HEAD version. I'll be updating HEAD in just a few moments

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill Patch for dir_control

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manvendra Bhangui wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 08:22 -0600, Matt Brookings wrote: >> Okay. I can definitely see how this would work. It is a reasonable >> solution, and I'd be very interested to see a completed patch against >> the CVS head. >> >