t? Or will their email
clients just automate the change?
*From:* "c...@milos.co.za"
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM
*Subject:* [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPA
e the way they connect? Or will their email clients just
automate the change?
>
> From: "c...@milos.co.za"
>To: vchkpw@inter7.com
>Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM
>Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM
ssful in the
> log) entries could be mail sent TO my server FROM another server on port 25.
> That tells me those are probably safe submissions - even if they are from
> overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly?
>
> -
> FROM: Tom Collins
> TO: vchkpw
on port 25.
> That tells me those are probably safe submissions - even if they are from
> overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly?
>
>
>
>
> From: Tom Collins
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillo
Ps. Am I thinking correctly?
>
> From: Tom Collins
>To: vchkpw@inter7.com
>Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM
>Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
>
>
>
>vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai
, March 4, 2014 10:02:12 PM GMT-08:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients
relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication.
vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for
vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients
relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication.
vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or
by other servers delivering mail to your server.
-Tom
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41 PM
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos
collaborateurs le traiteront aussi rapidement que possible.
Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Vous ne pouvez donc pas y
répondre.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées.
BNP Paribas Fortis SA
T :
Just to be sure:
that is qmail-local gets the signal 13 from vdelivermail. Vdelivermail
has the pipe to qmail-inject broken when qmail-inject closes the pipe.
2460 2453 2453 ?00:00:00 supervise
19523 2453 2453 ?00:00:00 qmail-send
19525 2453 2453 ?
Grazie Remo,
anyway I managed to find here http://surbl.freeapp.net/qmail/011_surbl
the patch that I was looking for. It's already embedded into my package.
On next days I'll do more tests.
regards
Roberto
On Wed, 04 May 2011 13:56:52 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
Sorry one more
http://riemann
Sorry one more
http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/programs/qmail-rbl.c
Remo
On 5/4/11 1:40 PM, "Roberto Puzzanghera" wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
>> (does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?).
>
>
Here is anther link
http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/programs/rblsmtpd-timeout.tar.gz
Bye,
Remo
On 5/4/11 1:40 PM, "Roberto Puzzanghera" wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
>> (does this patch have the rbl patch in
Here you can get mine
http://italy1.com/ucspi-tcp-0.88.nodefaultrbl.patch
Ciao
Remo
On 5/4/11 1:40 PM, "Roberto Puzzanghera" wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
>> (does this patch have the rbl patch installed as w
On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
(does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?).
Ciao Remo,
the link to the surbl patch is still broken for months
http://www.surbl.org/qmail/011_surbl
I would be glad if someone ca
Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
(does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?).
Remo
On 5/4/11 5:14 AM, "Roberto Puzzanghera" wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the
> latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hoffmann, smtp-tls by F.V
Hi,
Yes , I using qmail-1.03 ...
I testing manual applying chkuser patch ...
Thanks !
-Message d'origine-
De : Roberto Puzzanghera [mailto:ad...@sagredo.eu]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2011 14:44
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Hi,
my packag
patching file strtimet.c
patching file tcp-env.c
patching file tls.c
patching file tls.h
patching file update_tmprsadh.sh
patching file wildmat.c
-Message d'origine-
De : Roberto Puzzanghera [mailto:ad...@sagredo.eu]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2011 13:14
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [v
-Message d'origine-
De : Roberto Puzzanghera [mailto:ad...@sagredo.eu]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2011 13:14
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Hi,
I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the
latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hof
Hi,
I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the
latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hoffmann, smtp-tls by F.Vermulen and
chkuser.
I can put together a package with just smtp-auth and chkuser if you
like.. Anyway you can do it by yourself applying chkuser over smtp-tls
and f
On 5/2/11 2:35 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
aliases are .qmail-aliasname files.
"matt-foo" is not an alias. It is an extension of name "matt".
Thank you for the clarification.
For enabling extensions you must enable (uncomment)
CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS
For enabling ezmlm lists, you
aliases are .qmail-aliasname files.
"matt-foo" is not an alias. It is an extension of name "matt".
For enabling extensions you must enable (uncomment)
CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS
For enabling ezmlm lists, you must enable (uncomment)
CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS.
See
http://www.interazioni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2010 05:42 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote:
> Shane Chrisp wrote:
>> On 10/09/10 02:14, Matt Brookings wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/09/2010 12:37 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote:
>>>
Matt Brookings wrote:
> Peter, the
Shane Chrisp wrote:
On 10/09/10 02:14, Matt Brookings wrote:
On 09/09/2010 12:37 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote:
Matt Brookings wrote:
Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses
the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes
addr
On 10/09/10 02:14, Matt Brookings wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 12:37 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote:
> > Matt Brookings wrote:
> >> Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses
> >> the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes
> >> address books and singl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2010 12:37 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote:
> Matt Brookings wrote:
>> Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses
>> the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes
>> address books and single si
Matt Brookings wrote:
Peter, the LDAP module in 5.5 is actively being re-written and uses
the inetOrgPerson schema as a base for its user entries. It makes
address books and single sign on easy.
This will be available in beta form some time next week. I would
recommend waiting for that.
C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/03/2010 05:24 PM, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote:
> So will this work / support my needs?
>
> OpenLDAP
> netqmail (anybody used Zinq - http://sourceforge.net/projects/zinq/ )
> dovecot - talking to LDAP
> vpopmail for 'linking' LDAP and Qmail +
: Re: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/30/2010 01:18 AM, Den Arion wrote:
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 25600 \
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l "$LOCAL" -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c
> "$MAXSMTPD" \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/30/2010 01:18 AM, Den Arion wrote:
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 25600 \
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l "$LOCAL" -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c
> "$MAXSMTPD" \
> -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtp
From: Jerkovic Bosko
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 4:26 AM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail, starttls and vchkpw
Im not sure how you installed vpopmail, but check this, what is in
/data/apps/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql file, is mysql info right, and be sure
to check permis
Im not sure how you installed vpopmail, but check this, what is in
/data/apps/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql file, is mysql info right, and be sure
to check permissions, owner of vpopmail.mysql needs to be same user that is
owner of vpopmail (usually vpopmail user vchkpw group, that is if you haven
ERE domain='dom_1054';
(ADADT the UID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in
previous_server and new_server)
new_server:~# qmailctl start
Hope this help !
Thibault
- Original Message - From: "Ron Miller"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:20 AM
Subject: RE:
the
UID to what you've found in /etc/passwd in previous_server and new_server)
new_server:~# qmailctl start
Hope this help !
Thibault
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Miller"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:20 AM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Qmail migration
Here is
- ta...@nayatel.com a écrit :
> please suggest
>
> I am migrating Qmail from one Machine to another.Have taken following
>
> steps but no luck.
>
> 1- I have taken dump of Mysql and and restored it on new machine.
> 2- SCP all Domain and email boxes to new machine.
> 3- Fixed all permissio
Here is how:
http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/migrate-domain.shtml
Be sure NOT to use IE. Use Firefox instead.
I have used this script many times.
-Ron
-Original Message-
From: ta...@nayatel.com [mailto:ta...@nayatel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:34 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject
On 15/06/2010 1:34 PM, ta...@nayatel.com wrote:
please suggest
I am migrating Qmail from one Machine to another.Have taken following
steps but no luck.
1- I have taken dump of Mysql and and restored it on new machine.
2- SCP all Domain and email boxes to new machine.
3- Fixed all permissions.
DAve wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> We have been using qmail-tap to send copies of one domains emails to an
> archive server. The other day the archive server failed and the messages
> began filling up my qmail queue.
>
> Is there a way I can setup a separate queue just for the messages being
> creat
I've never had any issues with them personally (aside from not liking the
concept) but as far as I know neither vpopmail nor qmail have anything to do
with delivery confirmation. It's a MUA to MUA thing and the recipient can
decide if he wants to confirm he read the message. Your client just nee
I found the patch. Qreceipt is the key.
Bye
Remo
On 7/2/09 10:09 PM, "Remo Mattei" wrote:
> Hello I wonder if anyone has done qmail vpopmail and delivery confirmation
> since I have a client that asked me about to get notified when sending an
> email out with outlook.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
compile qmail-admin with --enable-modify-quota
---
- Nick Bright
Network Administrator
Terra World Communications, LLC
Tel 888-332-1616 x 315
Fax 620-332-1201
Tariq Azad/OPS wrote:
Can any body tell me how to enable quota in qmail admin so that
postmaster could assign quota from the qm
Tariq Azad/OPS a écrit :
Can any body tell me how to enable quota in qmail admin so that
postmaster could assign quota from the qmailadmin control panel Thanks.
I think you must compile qmail with quota support.
!DSPAM:4885f09a32311776915901!
Maybe just rsync at regular intervals after initial replication?
You could also create a second local qmail install with an smtproutes
entry for the local domain to point to the new server. Then add a
forward within a global maildrop filter using /var/qmail2/bin/forward
(which will use your 2nd
Sorry, personally im not familiar with qmail-tap, just thought this could
help you. Goodluck in your endavors.
- Wouter
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qm
That will not work for this particular migration. They need two
separate systems for 6months as they test the new and be able to use
the old one at any time.
That is why qmail tap looked ideal.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Wouter van der Schagt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What i did was...
>
What i did was...
old server
- Change TTL values in zonefile to 5 minutes and wait till it is propagated
(normally 1 day)
- Create domain and popboxes on new server
- Copy contents from old server to new server with scp (popboxes)
- remove domain and popboxes from old server
- Disable pop acces
I commented out macro
#define LOG_ON_SUCCESS
(or something like this, I don;t remember, sorry) in my chkuser
installation. It helps me.
Florian Leeber пишет:
Hi folks,
after rather long but then successul compile marathon I finally habe
everything in place...but...
- inbound mail without
http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined.shtml
Try the patch there. And take this up with Mr. Simpson if you have
problems with his patch (you should not)
!DSPAM:47a1341c310546330020416!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
it's already in
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quey wrote:
> Rick Romero wrote:
>
>> I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
>> for the basic quota check.
>>
>> Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and
>> behold,
>> it's already
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Quey wrote:
>>>
Rick Romero wrote:
> I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
> for the basic quota check.
>
> Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
> it's already in there.
>
Rick Romero ha scritto:
Actually, as I was falling asleep last night (isn't that always the
case), I wondered why chkuser.c sets maxmbxquota_limit = 0 and not 100
by default. It would seem to me if you're enabling the define, you
would already expect that function to just work, n
Actually, as I was falling asleep last night (isn't that always the
case), I wondered why chkuser.c sets maxmbxquota_limit = 0 and not 100
by default. It would seem to me if you're enabling the define, you
would already expect that function to just work, not go to another place
a
Rick Romero wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Quey wrote:
>>>
Rick Romero wrote:
> I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
> for the basic quota check.
>
> Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
it's already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readqu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
it's already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readqu
>
>
> Rick Romero wrote:
>> I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for
>> the basic quota check.
>
>
>
>> Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
>> it's already in there.
>
>
>
>> It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it do
> Quey wrote:
>> Rick Romero wrote:
>>> I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
>>> for the basic quota check.
>>>
>>> Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
>>> it's already in there.
>>> 'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
>>> if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_p
Quey wrote:
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place
for the basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,
it's already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the
basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's
already in there.
It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what the pare
Rick Romero wrote:
I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the
basic quota check.
Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's
already in there.
'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8
if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \
(use
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 09:56 -0800, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2007, at 6:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm using John Simpsons last combined patch... I'm trying to know if I
> > could any way... cause qmail to reject messages at smtp dialogue if
> > users
> > we're trying to deliver is
On Dec 9, 2007, at 6:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using John Simpsons last combined patch... I'm trying to know if I
could any way... cause qmail to reject messages at smtp dialogue if
users
we're trying to deliver is overquota instead of bouncing it...
black lists
are nowadays becomin
On Dec 8, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro wrote:
My system is: uname -a
Linux devel 2.6.18-xen #1 SMP Mon Dec 3 18:30:06 BRST 2007 x86_64
GNU/Linux
I got the same problem on x86_32 too. Always inside a PVM of XEN,
out of XEN, vchkpw works fine.
I do a workarround with my
> Hello everybody,
>
> Currently I have a qmail, courier-imap, and vpopmail (mysql) setup
> going (running under Gentoo on Xen) and I am having problems. Please
> excuse me if this turns out to not be a vpopmail issue, but at this
> point I believe that it is. I can't receive mail to my domain
07 11:17
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Hi,
They patch it for their greylisting solution, enabling it to do reverse
DNS checks and how it handles RBLSMTPD connections, or maybe they used
the Bill Shupp toaster version. :)
Were is this patch?
Cheers
Matt
JPC InfoNet Li
puter.
==
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2007 02:21
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Matthew Moore wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yup they all have .qmail files. Qmail-inject has been recompiled a
fair
>
ginal Message-
From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 November 2007 02:34
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Matthew Moore wrote:
Hi,
I can see in my qmail send log -
@4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral:
qmail-inject:_
puter.
==
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 November 2007 02:34
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Matthew Moore wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I can see
Matthew Moore wrote:
Hi,
I can see in my qmail send log –
@4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral:
qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/To: XX
"Car/write_to_qmail-inject_failed:_32/system_error_calling_qmail-inject/
Now what seems strange is the email
cpu031,5%0,0%0,7% 0,0% 0,3% 91,2%5,9%
Regards,
Joao
- Original Message - From: "Nick Bright"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
João Luiz - Terra wrote:
Hi Rick,
I
Hi Tren,
Thank you!
I´m testing the sysstat
Regards,
Joao
- Original Message -
From: "Tren Blackburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:51 PM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
-Original Message-
From: João Luiz - Terr
Hi DAve,
Thank you!
Regards,
Joao
- Original Message -
From: "DAve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform
João Luiz - Terra wrote:
Hi all,
Are there problems with qmail in redhat lin
João Luiz - Terra wrote:
Hi all,
Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux enterprise 64 bit?
Thank you
Joao
I am running qmail on two SunFire servers under FreeBSD 64 with no
issues and wonderful performance. I'd try it.
DAve
--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't hav
The single best performance enhancer you could do would be the external
todo patch, from my point of view.
Depends on the filesystem. If the filesystem has indexed directory
support, ext-todo should be sufficient. Otherwise, you need the
big-ext-todo patch.
> -Original Message-
> From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:13 PM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
>
> Hi Nick.
>
> Thank you.
>
> When concurrent POP3 is low, th
% 0,0% 0,3% 91,2%5,9%
Regards,
Joao
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Bright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
João Luiz - Terra wrote:
Hi Rick,
In SMTP Totals:
Max Allow 14
Hi Itamar,
I use tcpserver.
The qmail is starting after reboot automatically.
Is correct?
Regards,
Joao
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Reis Peixoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
r 07, 2007 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Itamar,
I disable the spamassassin and clamav when my server is slow.
Regards,
Joao
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Reis Peixoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 9:29 PM
connections with "not existing recipient".
>>
>> My server was very good. Between last monday and last friday it is
>> very slow.
>> How can I identify a possible attack?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Joao
>>
>> - Original Message - From
on't have the
deal with the load of processing their mail.
Do you want see others logs of qmailmrtg?
Thank you
Joao
- Original Message - From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performan
it is very
slow.
How can I identify a possible attack?
Thank you
Joao
- Original Message - From: "Tren Blackburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:02 PM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Joao;
From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL
see others logs of qmailmrtg?
Thank you
Joao
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi,
João Luiz - Terra wrote:
Hi Tren,
Sorry. My english is not good :
unday, October 07, 2007 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi,
João Luiz - Terra wrote:
Hi Tren,
Sorry. My english is not good :).
My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb.
I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many
connections POP3
Hi,
João Luiz - Terra wrote:
Hi Tren,
Sorry. My english is not good :).
My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb.
I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many
connections POP3 and SMTP.
I use isoqlog to analyze my email traffic, but I don´t have stats of
Hi Itamar,
I disable the spamassassin and clamav when my server is slow.
Regards,
Joao
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Reis Peixoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
your load is very hi
ober 07, 2007 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Tren,
Sorry. My english is not good :).
My server is dual xeon 2.4 with 2 Gb RAM and HD SCSI 73 Gb.
I have problems with delivery delay when my server is with many
connections POP3 and SMTP.
I use isoqlog to analyze my email
y and last friday it is very
slow.
How can I identify a possible attack?
Thank you
Joao
- Original Message -
From: "Tren Blackburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 8:02 PM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
Hi Joao;
From: João L
Hi Joao;
> From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:22 PM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: [vchkpw] qmail high performance
>
> Hello,
>
> I am working with qmail toaster by http://www.shupp.org/toaster/.
> Is it the better performance instalation?
Quey wrote:
So you add all your new domains by hand ?? most of us have
intergrated systems and something central that connects and doe sit all,
be it a local custom CRM or one of the off shelf ones, so everything is
linked, maybe you should be writing a wrapper :)
We add users direct
So you add all your new domains by hand ?? most of us have
intergrated systems and something central that connects and doe sit all,
be it a local custom CRM or one of the off shelf ones, so everything is
linked, maybe you should be writing a wrapper :)
DAve wrote:
Quey wrote:
DAve
Quey wrote:
DAve wrote:
I discovered something interesting the other day, something I really
should have been paying attention to earlier.
It would seem I cannot get an abuse address to work using qmail
aliases in the /var/qmail/alias directory. Of course vadddomain does
not create them for
DAve wrote:
I discovered something interesting the other day, something I really
should have been paying attention to earlier.
It would seem I cannot get an abuse address to work using qmail
aliases in the /var/qmail/alias directory. Of course vadddomain does
not create them for me.
What is
Michele are you italian? If you want contact me
offline.
Ciao,
Remo
Michele Virgilio wrote:
I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 machine on a
new CentOs machine.
It is possible to copy all data without reinstall (and configure)? How can I
do?
Thanks.
Mik
!DSP
You also need to backup mysql if you use it :) and
the assgin and virtual host in qmail otherwise you have to install all
the domains with the same username and passwd and then copy over the
users' info
Ciao,
Remo
Ron Miller wrote:
Mik,
You want to install vpopmail as usual on th
Sorry, hit wrong button...
No for the software side, depending on how you have your mail setup, courier
or pop3 depends on the mail itself. If it's pop3 you can move it just fine,
as long as you setup vpopmail the same as before. If your using courier,
you can use a program like imapsync (source
Short answer, NO, libs are different...
Joe
Michele Virgilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 machine on
>a
>new CentOs machine.
>It is possible to copy all data without reinstall (and configure)? How can
>I
>do?
>Thanks.
>Mik
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michele Virgilio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 6:04 AM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 to
> CentOs
>
> I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 mac
Hi All,
Much thanks for all the helpful replies.
I have reverted back to courier-imap v3.0.8, and all is now working as
expected - open-smtp is being updated properly by both imap and pop3.
Again thanks for quick replies and for pointing me in the right
direction to resolve this!!
Best reg
Hi Joshua,
Thanks for the reply.
The majority of my users are using pop3 - however I have a handful of
senior execs that need/want to use imap (this is tied to our webmail &
wapmail interfaces). This cutomer was an existing user of
qmail/vpopmail/courier (installed in 2003) however we just r
Rick Widmer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 07:49:31AM -0700:
>
>
> Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP) wrote:
> >Hi Micheal,
> >
> >Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw
> >--without-authdaemon" but it made no difference.
> >
> >If I understand your email correctly, since I'm
1 - 100 of 573 matches
Mail list logo
