be a 'bad' idea? I
don't see any harm in it.
Chris Bunnell
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ben Beuchler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 4:26 PM
Subject: Re:
o find someone who's solved the same situation.
Thanks!
Randy
- Original Message -
From: Ben Beuchler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: Problems with reverse-IP domains: authentication
ceases to work afte
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 06:11:17PM -0600, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> There is no way what you are describing CAN be done without IP-based
> domains. If you read the POP RFCs (1725 is the main one) you will see
> that the domain name is not part of the transaction. Hence, you need to
> specify the ex
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 03:14:10PM -0800, Randy Harmon wrote:
> I've done everything that's documented for allowing authentication
> to use server foobar.com, username fred. I see a number of others
> have encountered the same problem as I: it doesn't work. I see no
> solutions in the mailing l
I've done everything that's documented for allowing authentication
to use server foobar.com, username fred. I see a number of others
have encountered the same problem as I: it doesn't work. I see no
solutions in the mailing list archive. How frustrating. Maybe
with this thread, a resolution ca
