Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Tom Collins
On Jun 30, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Henti Smith wrote: where is a decent howto these days http://shupp.org/toaster/ I use it every time I build a new hosting server (every 3 years or so). -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ Y

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thursday 30 June 2005 03:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't consider myself much of a code man or guru on mail servers but > when I choose qmail, I know I have to get my sleeves rolled up and get > stuck in.. > > Also when making your own mail server, shouldn't you have a little idea of >

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Chris Godwin
ginal Message - From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 3:43 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ... > Chris Godwin wrote: > > >All I know is that I installed simscan and chose clamav as the viral > >scann

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Rick Macdougall
Chris Godwin wrote: All I know is that I installed simscan and chose clamav as the viral scanner. The error message that shows as follows: odin clamav # clamscan LibClamAV Warning: LibClamAV Warning: *** This version of the ClamAV engine

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Chris Godwin
when using custom smtp rejection compiled in. Not answering your question as why these things happen. Just stating that they just happen. - Original Message - From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [v

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Henti Smith
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:49:26 -0500 "Chris Godwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the only way to avoid double bounces is chkuser patch. Postfix is find for a > few domains, less control imho. simscan has a spamassasin.pl patch that > enables peruser sa checking with vpopmail. I'll try chkuser and s

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread dballantyne
I don't consider myself much of a code man or guru on mail servers but when I choose qmail, I know I have to get my sleeves rolled up and get stuck in.. Also when making your own mail server, shouldn't you have a little idea of what you are getting into... Just my ten cents.. > On Thursday 30 J

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Rick Macdougall
Chris Godwin wrote: problems with qmailrocks-- vpopmail mail quota system is broken because of no maildir++ patch and few patches that enable chkuser and others, qmailscannerqueue is a freakin mem hog. Uses qscanqueue or simscan. If you use simscan, clamav's out of date warning will cause a hard

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thursday 30 June 2005 02:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The BEST howto: Was using this for ages before I made the crazy leap to > gentoo ebuild. May have to move back soon!! > > http://qmailrocks.org/ i disagree. It throws WAY too much stuff at the novice user. I can't tell you how many pe

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Chris Godwin
IL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 2:45 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ... > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:42:28 - (GMT) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The BEST howto: Was using this for ages before I made the crazy leap to > > gentoo ebuild. May have

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Chris Godwin
n the client end, you must not enable custom smtp rejection messages. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 2:42 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ... > The BEST howto: Was using this for ages before I made the crazy leap to &

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Henti Smith
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:42:28 - (GMT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The BEST howto: Was using this for ages before I made the crazy leap to > gentoo ebuild. May have to move back soon!! sadly .. after all this .. and the missions I have been through to get any kind of decent spam/virus protectio

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread dballantyne
The BEST howto: Was using this for ages before I made the crazy leap to gentoo ebuild. May have to move back soon!! http://qmailrocks.org/ > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:19:18 -0500 > Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> solution: don't use gentoo's qmail ebuilds. > > where is a decent howt

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thursday 30 June 2005 02:30 pm, Henti Smith wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:19:18 -0500 > > Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > solution: don't use gentoo's qmail ebuilds. > > where is a decent howto these days ... since I HAVE to get my vpopmail > working with relay on pop as it was b

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Henti Smith
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:19:18 -0500 Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > solution: don't use gentoo's qmail ebuilds. where is a decent howto these days ... since I HAVE to get my vpopmail working with relay on pop as it was before .. right now it's broken. > I've been saying this all o

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Henti Smith
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:33:05 -0500 "Chris Godwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gentoo is great, but the developers handleing the ebuilds for vpopmail and > qmail need to freakin chill on the custom crap... I see it as forcing me to > go from source on everything. no kidding .. my primary vhost se

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thursday 30 June 2005 01:33 pm, Chris Godwin wrote: > gentoo is great, but the developers handleing the ebuilds for vpopmail and > qmail need to freakin chill on the custom crap... I see it as forcing me to > go from source on everything. solution: don't use gentoo's qmail ebuilds. I've been s

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Chris Godwin
30, 2005 1:15 PM Subject: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ... > This is pretty much in responce to Jeffrey A Schmidt's mail called "can't relay any more" posted on Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:28:34 -0700 > > Jeffrey, > > Gentoo has once again made HUGE changes to a package w

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread dballantyne
00 > > Jeffrey, > > Gentoo has once again made HUGE changes to a package without informing > it's users thereof before allowing the package to install. > > this is from the ebuild : > > einfo "Use of vpopmail's tcp.smtp[.cdb] is also deprecated now, cons

[vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

2005-06-30 Thread Henti Smith
stall. this is from the ebuild : einfo "Use of vpopmail's tcp.smtp[.cdb] is also deprecated now, consider" einfo "using net-mail/relay-ctrl instead." incase you're wondering what this means ... from the install section: econf \ ##SNIP## --dis

Re: Off Topic - mail relay

2001-03-28 Thread Francis P. Ling
Kris von Mach writes: > Francis, > > You can enter this to allow only 192.168.0.128 - 192.168.0.159: > > 192.168.0.128-159:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > __ > Kris. Thanks Kris. Another mystery solved. ++ | Francis P. Ling

Re: Off Topic - mail relay

2001-03-28 Thread Kris von Mach
y, March 28, 2001 8:24 PM Subject: Re: Off Topic - mail relay > Speaking about relay, I've a question that's been lingering in my mind since > setting up qmail a year ago. > > > In the tcpserver smtp rules, my syntax: > > 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" >

Re: Off Topic - mail relay

2001-03-28 Thread Francis P. Ling
Speaking about relay, I've a question that's been lingering in my mind since setting up qmail a year ago. In the tcpserver smtp rules, my syntax: 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" will allow all IP matching 192.168.0 to relay. That's bad since my domain may be consisted of IP ranging from 1

Mail Relay

2000-09-13 Thread Martin Chung
Hi, If I want to deny mail relay so that no people can use my mail server to send unauthorized mail, is there any option for qmail to config this? If no, what can I do? Thanks in advance! Martin