CTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: For you xxSQL users...
> I am using RedHat 7.1 stock kernel. The NFS is pretty stable. With the
> exception of the roaming users. With the amount of concurrency that I run
> the fil
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: For you xxSQL users...
> Hi,
> I used linux NFS before(linux-2.2.17, redhat 6.2).But the linux box
may crash.Would u tell me whick version kernel you are using?Do u think it
is fit for production now?
> Th
CTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 4:37 AM
Subject: Re[2]: For you xxSQL users...
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Hello Joe,
>
> Sunday, October 14, 2001, 12:14:08 AM, you wrote:
>
> > I had 5000+ users on a Free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Joe,
Sunday, October 14, 2001, 12:14:08 AM, you wrote:
> I had 5000+ users on a FreeBSD server. Just merged that onto 4
> Linux boxes and added another ~4000 users. No problems here.
> Except that NFS sucks worse o
I am kinda leary about the initial load of the
metadata. Anyone using Coda to share out a 160Gig volume??
Thanks,
Joe Modjeski
- Original Message -
From: "Troy Settle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 9:21 AM
Subject: For you
I'd like to hear (successes and failures) from people who've tried using one
of the SQL modules with thousands of users and 10's of thousands of messages
per day.
How about 10's of thousands of users and 100's of thousands of messages per
day?
Which SQL server are you using, what OSes, etc...
