Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.20 released

2007-08-24 Thread Joshua Megerman
> On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Rick Widmer wrote: >> http://vpopmail.sf.net/ >> >> 5.4.20 - released 21-Aug-07 > > Feels odd to ask this, but in the UPGRADE document, it lists the > "pw_domain" > columns as requiring updates, but my databases have just "domain" in them > except for the vpopmail ta

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.20 released

2007-08-23 Thread Quey
Quey wrote: Rick ? Is this correct or should we be doing something else like Tony asked and renaming all domains to pw_domains ? my bad, I was talking to Tony, I meant what Steve asked? :) ( it is early you know hehe)

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.20 released

2007-08-23 Thread Quey
Steve Cole wrote: On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Rick Widmer wrote: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ 5.4.20 - released 21-Aug-07 Feels odd to ask this, but in the UPGRADE document, it lists the "pw_domain" columns as requiring updates, but my databases have just "domain" in them except for the

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.20 released

2007-08-22 Thread Steve Cole
On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Rick Widmer wrote: > http://vpopmail.sf.net/ > > 5.4.20 - released 21-Aug-07 Feels odd to ask this, but in the UPGRADE document, it lists the "pw_domain" columns as requiring updates, but my databases have just "domain" in them except for the vpopmail table. I've up

[vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.20 released

2007-08-22 Thread Rick Widmer
http://vpopmail.sf.net/ 5.4.20 - released 21-Aug-07 Release Notes: Except for ldap and two new vpopmaild commands, this is entirely a bug fix release. Tracker items in this release: 1765534 - vdominfo crashes with a lot of aliased domains 1909348 - ldap patch A number of items that