mail's license.
But if these have already been suggested and are not viable to
you for some reason then please disregardmy 2 cents here is
in Canadian... ;)
Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11
on
>>>> BSD? There's others, but I've used both over the years with no problems. I
>>>> haven't switched to netqmail 1.06 but I thought it was primarily just a
>>>> version increment to reflect the change in qmail's license.
>>>>
>
Brian Lanier ha scritto:
- Original Message -
*From:* James Cox <mailto:ja...@imaj.es>
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com <mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com>
*Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
*Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fres
for some reason then please disregardmy 2 cents here is in
Canadian... ;)
Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:4
- Original Message -
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fresh install of toaster.
i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's
conf
viable to you for some
>> reason then please disregardmy 2 cents here is in Canadian... ;)
>>
>> Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tren
>>
>>
>> From: James Cox
>> To: vchkpw@inter7.co
your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/
track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Pa
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
).
qmail 1.0.5 and 1.0.6 should be extremely similar and I wonder if
it is worth using 1.0.6.
Weird, i installed the patch with Erwin's smtp
Thank you James, grazie Tonino.
!DSPAM:4a30ba6832669637967409!
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:00, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth pa
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with othe
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with other auth patches com
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER r
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362
Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHK
Here is mine you can try to use my settings..
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
export QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
export NOP0FCHECK=1
export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2200 \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
> yeah, i saw that patch. but i am using the current version (i think?) 0.31
I'm not really sure *why* it would be happening and I don't really have a
solution
to pose to you. I just wanted you to be aware that the output you were s
I used Bill's and works fine. I do have chkuser installed on mine with smtp
auth.
Remo
On 6/10/09 9:25 AM, "Rick Macdougall" wrote:
> James Cox wrote:
>>
>> On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>>
>>> James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
175
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of t
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of those two are enabl
Hi James,
What version of chkuser are you using?
When I look at the 2.0.9 source, I see the following lines inside
chkuser_settings.h:
/*
* the following line enables debugging of chkuser
*/
/* #define CHKUSER_DEBUG */
/*
* The following line moves DEBUG output from STDOUT (default) to ST
hey Harm,
Here's the run file for the log -
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t
s250 n 10 /var/log/qmail/smtpd
and yeah- i figured that i'm pushing to stdout... which i expect the
log/run should catch via the multilog. therefore i'm a bit confused as
to how
Hi James,
You are copying stderr (file descriptor 2) to your stdout (that's what
the terminating 2>&1 is for). However, this log is only saved if
multilog is indeed catching it.
Find in the directory where this `run' file was located the directory
`log', and publish the content of the `run'
On 9 Jun 2009, at 18:16, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been
looking
at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
> Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been looking
> at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
> immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced that these lines should ever
> exist in the smtp
Hey,
Here's an (edited) example of a smtp conversation, with a netqmail
install with smtp auth and chkuser patches:
220 mail.23i.net ESMTP
EHLO imaj.es
250-mail.23i.net
250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
AUTH LOGIN
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
334 UGF
30 matches
Mail list logo
