Re: [vchkpw] request

2005-08-13 Thread Ronaldo Chan
Christophe Casalegno wrote: Le Mardi 9 Août 2005 23:16, Saimir Hafizi a écrit : Hi there, One of the domain names cannot get messages on qmail, can send only. Any help will be appriciated. I.T Department Your problem is it that the delivery don't work or simply the get by POP ? best

Re: [vchkpw] request

2005-08-13 Thread Christophe Casalegno
Le Mardi 9 Août 2005 23:16, Saimir Hafizi a écrit : > Hi there, > One of the domain names cannot get messages on qmail, can send only. > Any help will be appriciated. > > I.T Department Your problem is it that the delivery don't work or simply the get by POP ? best regards, -- Christophe Casale

[vchkpw] request

2005-08-09 Thread Saimir Hafizi
Hi there, One of the domain names cannot get messages on qmail, can send only. Any help will be appriciated. I.T Department

Re: [vchkpw] Request for new feature: Internal-only accounts

2005-06-15 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 19:53, Bruno Negrão wrote: > Wouldn't the string NOQUOTA be exactly in the place where there is a 60MB > in my example above? Yes, sorry. I'm blind! > But this feature is still useful I'm not sure how...what is the use you see? How on earth do you really intend to stop

Re: [vchkpw] Request for new feature: Internal-only accounts

2005-06-14 Thread Rick Macdougall
Bruno Negrão wrote: Hi Casey, patrick:$1$oza9XaY.qO8uXhlaR701:1:0:patrick is internal only:/var/vpopmail/domains/exampledom.com.br/patrick:60MB:textpasswd:INTERN AL You'd at least need an extra colon before INTERNAL, because there's already the optional NOQUOTA property. Wouldn't the

Re: [vchkpw] Request for new feature: Internal-only accounts

2005-06-14 Thread Bruno Negrão
Hi Casey, patrick:$1$oza9XaY.qO8uXhlaR701:1:0:patrick is internal only:/var/vpopmail/domains/exampledom.com.br/patrick:60MB:textpasswd:INTERN AL You'd at least need an extra colon before INTERNAL, because there's already the optional NOQUOTA property. Wouldn't the string NOQUOTA be exactly in t

Re: [vchkpw] Request for new feature: Internal-only accounts

2005-06-14 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:58, Bruno Negrão wrote: > If vpopmail start supporting a new user property, "INTERNAL", inside > vpasswd file, like the prototype bellow: > > patrick:$1$oza9XaY.qO8uXhlaR701:1:0:patrick is internal > only:/var/vpopmail/domains/exampledom.com.br/patrick:60MB:textpasswd:INT

Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-14 Thread Bruno Negrão
This could also be done with a flag in the vadduser/vmoduser programs? Yes, perfect! KBO (or some vpopmail developer), are you reading this thread? Regards, bnegrao

RE: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-14 Thread Andrew Preece
>If vpopmail start supporting a new user property, "INTERNAL", inside >vpasswd file, like the prototype bellow: > >patrick:$1$oza9XaY.qO8uXhlaR701:1:0:patrick is internal >only:/var/vpopmail/domains/exampledom.com.br/patrick:60MB:textpasswd:INTERN AL The only qualm I see with that is how upgra

Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-14 Thread Bruno Negrão
Guys, With the QMAILQUEUE patch it's possible to add a program that scans the passing messages(local and remote) and block some of them, based on certain criteria. Correct? (that's how inter7's simscan software works) With this, I could add a program to filter the passing messages to block t

Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-14 Thread Boris Pavlov
Bruno Negrão wrote: Thanks Tom, but this is not what I'm looking for. I want that, in the same domain and network, some users can send-receive external emails and some user are interal-only. regards, bruno place a second, relay-only server, and block there. the main server will be used fro

Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-14 Thread Bruno Negrão
nday, June 13, 2005 6:12 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS On Jun 13, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Bruno Negrão wrote: Now, the director of one of the companies I give support asked me to set a bunch of e-mail accounts as internal-only, i.e., they can send e-mail inter

Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-14 Thread Boris Pavlov
just run another mail server. on a different machine or port. better on a different machine - if you want to have really "internal" mail, you must have "internal" server - meaning security. wwell edi Bruno Negrão wrote: Hi guys, As managers and directors of the companies are getting more a

Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Jun 13, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Bruno Negrão wrote: Now, the director of one of the companies I give support asked me to set a bunch of e-mail accounts as internal-only, i.e., they can send e-mail internally but cannot send or receive external e-mails. It would have to take place entirely in qma

Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-13 Thread Bruno Negrão
Hi Nick, Sounds not terribly difficult, and does actually sound pretty useful. Similar functionality exists in commercial servers like Exchange and Domino, so obviously other folks find it useful. Good to know that other mailservers already implement this feature. Maybe this helps to motivate

RE: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-13 Thread Nick Harring
> > The ideal scene for me would be if vpopmail could provide a means for > doing > this. To set the internal-only account I'd like to end up going to > Qmailadmin, editing the properties of some user account, and just checking > the new check-box: "( ) Internal-only account"; Look at how vpopmai

[vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-13 Thread =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bruno_Negr=E3o?=
Hi guys, As managers and directors of the companies are getting more acquainted about the Internet use (and abuse) inside their companies, they want to have more and more control over what employees can and cannot do on the Internet. Now, the director of one of the companies I give support a

Re: [vchkpw] Request for comments

2003-07-25 Thread Jeff Hedlund
spork wrote: I think a vchkpw-devel list would also be worthwhile. It has helped keep things in order for qmailadmin... I agree. Jeff

Re: [vchkpw] Request for comments

2003-07-25 Thread spork
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Gerald Villemure wrote: > Would GREATLY improve the usability of vpopmail in many environments. > > Am I the only one to think this? No, I'm sure, but right now I think there's a lot of work going into cleaning things up and making some basic decisions on how things should wo

[vchkpw] Request for comments

2003-07-25 Thread Gerald Villemure
I realise that I have not been contributing patches to the vpopmail/qmailadmin projects but in my view it's almost as importent to contribute on the side of strategy and ideas. The recommendation that can bee found here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=vchkpw&m=105893690024181&w=2 Would GREATLY i

[vchkpw] Request for comments

2003-06-04 Thread Gerardo Arnaez
I have wriiten a small how to It sets up a debian (stable) based qmail, vpopmail, qmailadmin. It allows virutal email SMTP after POP authentication I did this because it took a lot of work for me to pull in all the various details. it can be read at http://mung.net I would be pleased to here any