Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap for mail archive

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jukka Kurkela wrote: > dhaval thakar wrote: > >> >> /var/qmail/control/taps contains >> us...@test.com:us...@arch.test.com >> us...@test.com:us...@arch.test.com >> us...@test.com:us...@arch.test.com

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap for mail archive

dhaval thakar wrote: /var/qmail/control/taps contains us...@test.com:us...@arch.test.com us...@test.com:us...@arch.test.com us...@test.com:us...@arch.test.com in above config mails for remote domains gets copied

[vchkpw] qmailtap for mail archive

Hi, As mentioned on http://www.inter7.com/?page=qmailtap I am trying to use qmailtap for mail archive. I am using http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/qmail-1.03-jms1.7.06.patch. I am testing this patch on test.com & for archive arch.test.com Few users are created on test.com, same users are created on

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap.

On 12 Apr 2006, at 8:23 PM, Ken Jones wrote: N0K wrote: Hello. Im using qmail-tap for backup mails, but i dont want backup from/to root user, how can i exclude this accound from qmail-tap? This is my /var/qmail/control/taps [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have test:

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap.

There is nothing currently in the code to exclude accounts. But it sounds technically feasible. Thanks, ill wait the update :) Regards, N0K.

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap.

N0K wrote: Hello. Im using qmail-tap for backup mails, but i dont want backup from/to root user, how can i exclude this accound from qmail-tap? This is my /var/qmail/control/taps [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have test: [EMAIL PROTECTED] without any results. An

[vchkpw] qmailtap.

Hello. Im using qmail-tap for backup mails, but i dont want backup from/to root user, how can i exclude this accound from qmail-tap? This is my /var/qmail/control/taps [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have test: [EMAIL PROTECTED] without any results. Any idea?

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

On Monday 06 February 2006 19:22, John Simpson wrote: > On 2006-02-06, at 1620, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > >> i'm thinking about possibly including the qmailtap patch in my > >> combined > >> patch file. however, the biggest problem i've seen from people using > >> QUEUE_EXTRA is that they set up loop

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

did you do mine first and then qmailtap, or the other way around? did the patch apply cleanly or were there any rejects which had to be handled manually? Actually, I had tried do install both patches one after the other and was not able to ever get it to work. The two patches had a couple files

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

On 2006-02-07, at 0214, Adam Ossenford wrote: I was able to integrate your qmail-1.03-jms1.6c patch and the qmail tap patch successfully. did you do mine first and then qmailtap, or the other way around? did the patch apply cleanly or were there any rejects which had to be handled manual

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

my answer to this question is usually "i'm not going to add it to my combined patch- if you can add it, more power to you" but i figured in the interest of fairness i would at least ask the inter7 guys about it... the qmailtap web page lists this as one of the places to discuss qmailtap, and i k

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

On 2006-02-06, at 1620, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: i'm thinking about possibly including the qmailtap patch in my combined patch file. however, the biggest problem i've seen from people using QUEUE_EXTRA is that they set up loops when they try to send the copies to a remote address, and because

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

On Saturday 04 February 2006 23:47, John Simpson wrote: > just a quick question. i'm maintaining the monster combined patch that > "qmailrocks" has adopted, and over the past few months i've been hammered > with questions about using QUEUE_EXTRA. apparently it works with older > versions of my comb

[vchkpw] qmailtap question

just a quick question. i'm maintaining the monster combined patch that "qmailrocks" has adopted, and over the past few months i've been hammered with questions about using QUEUE_EXTRA. apparently it works with older versions of my combined patch, but since i added the ext_todo patch (which solves t

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap making duplicate copies and looping

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something very strange : when a user (being tapped) sends a mail to a forward (defined via qmailadmin) the mailbox where the tap points receives two copies of the mail. The destination mailbox where the forward points, is NOT being tapped and receives only one copy. I

[vchkpw] qmailtap making duplicate copies and looping

Something very strange : when a user (being tapped) sends a mail to a forward (defined via qmailadmin) the mailbox where the tap points receives two copies of the mail. The destination mailbox where the forward points, is NOT being tapped and receives only one copy. I can´t understand why thi