Jones
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:25
AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] postgres
On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 04:15 PM, VeNoMouS wrote:
erm 5.3.24?? the latest dev
is 5.3.23, and when you --enable-postgres=y, vauth.c symlinks to voracle.c
not vpgsql.cThe latest is 5.3.24
and
On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 02:00 PM, VeNoMouS wrote:
has any one actally been able to get vpopmail to work with postgresql yet?
Charles Boening contributed a few postgresql patches for the 5.3.24 release, and I'm assuming that at the very least he has been able to use it.
--
Tom Collins
[EMA
On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 04:15 PM, VeNoMouS wrote:
erm 5.3.24?? the latest dev is 5.3.23, and when you --enable-postgres=y, vauth.c symlinks to voracle.c not vpgsql.c
The latest is 5.3.24 and includes a patch to fix that.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail/
Hopefully Ken will update
I'm on vacation this week so replies will be spuratic.
The patches I submitted should allow postgres to work with the 5.3.24
vpopmail. If it doesn't, please email me the errors you get.
I did test my patches on a development system. Mail was delivered and I
was able to check my mail.
Thanks,
C
erm 5.3.24?? the latest dev is 5.3.23, and when you
--enable-postgres=y, vauth.c symlinks to voracle.c not vpgsql.c
- Original Message -
From:
Tom Collins
To: vpopmail list
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:52
AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] postgres
On Monday, August
has any one actally been able to get vpopmail to
work with postgresql yet?
> I'm updating the configure.in script to support the current
> postgres module.
> Question: What libraries need to be included?
> For example:
> Sybase needs: -lsybdb -lm
> Oracle needs: -lclntsh -lclient8
Postgres requires -lpq and -lssl -lcrypto if the postgres lib has ssl support.
Regards,
I'm updating the configure.in script to support the current
postgres module.
Question: What libraries need to be included?
For example:
Sybase needs: -lsybdb -lm
Oracle needs: -lclntsh -lclient8
Ken Jones
> Yup, since I wrote that email (Jan 14th) Andrew Kohlsmith made some
> changes that made it into 5.3.17. He mentioned that there was some work
> that still needed to be done on it.
Yup. I have backed down on that because we were running into some strange
little probelms I didn't have time to g
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:53, Ken Jones wrote:
> There already is a working postgres module in vpopmail.
> Looks like it's not built into the configure script.
Yup, since I wrote that email (Jan 14th) Andrew Kohlsmith made some
changes that made it into 5.3.17. He mentioned that there was some wor
ortorelli
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Charles J. Boening [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:30 PM
> > To: 'Caffeinate The World'
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Postgres sup
On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 11:15 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Are you sure this diff is against 5.3.16? It does not apply to my
copy, or the one on Inter7's devel page (which should be the same).
bah... I looked at the diff and saw ^Ms at the end of all the lines so
I
stripped them ou
> Are you sure this diff is against 5.3.16? It does not apply to my
> copy, or the one on Inter7's devel page (which should be the same).
bah... I looked at the diff and saw ^Ms at the end of all the lines so I
stripped them out. Attached is a fixed version that *does* apply.
Regards,
Andrew
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 08:33 PM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Anyone? There must be some developmental work going on with it or it
wouldn't have been in the tarball. I am willing to help work on it
but I
need some help getting over this initial hurdle (cleanly).
Nice, responsive list
Hi, everyone.
Just wanted to clear a few things up :)
As far as CVS is concerned, Inter7's development team is not the
largest. I tried to make the case for CVS some time ago, but it
isnt looking as if it will fly.
If you're interested in new
development on vpopmail, take a look on www.shupp.or
On Thursday 20 February 2003 09:59, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > 1.) CVS
>
> I strongly agree. The development snapshots are nice and all but for those
> of us who are trying to hack on it CVS would be a real boon. Especially
> with the new website design that thends to hide what I'd call the CVS
> 1.) CVS
I strongly agree. The development snapshots are nice and all but for those of
us who are trying to hack on it CVS would be a real boon. Especially with
the new website design that thends to hide what I'd call the CVS snapshot
versions.
> 2.) Actually reading their own mailing lists
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 23:33, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > Anyone? There must be some developmental work going on with it or it
> > wouldn't have been in the tarball. I am willing to help work on it but I
> > need some help getting over this initial hurdle (cleanly).
>
> Nice, responsive li
That's good. Haven't played with postgres lately. MySQL seemed
easy and quick enough. I've added a patch that checks the return
code from vopen_smtp_relay(). It used to be void. I changed the
interpretation such that it needs to return non-zero if the given
IP address wasn't already in the ta
> Anyone? There must be some developmental work going on with it or it
> wouldn't have been in the tarball. I am willing to help work on it but I
> need some help getting over this initial hurdle (cleanly).
Nice, responsive list. :-/
Attached is a patch to 5.3.16 which will get vpgsql to actua
> Ok I see that vpgsql is there... how the hell do I turn it on? The
> configure script has no clue about it, and I don't see a reference in
> Makefile.in at all
Anyone? There must be some developmental work going on with it or it wouldn't
have been in the tarball. I am willing to help wor
Ok I see that vpgsql is there... how the hell do I turn it on? The configure
script has no clue about it, and I don't see a reference in Makefile.in at
all
Regards,
Andrew
anything I can do to help out, let me know.
Jay Tortorelli
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles J. Boening [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:30 PM
> To: 'Caffeinate The World'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 04:29 PM, Charles J. Boening wrote:
I had done some finishing work with the code that Nels wrote and am
currently running vpopmail 5.3.4 in a production environment with a
little
over 1000 users. It works very well with no hangups that I have
noticed.
I submi
ve postgresql support.
Feel free to contact me off list if you'd like to discuss this further.
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Caffeinate The World [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Postgres support
--- Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Back in April of last year I'd asked about Postgres support in
> vpopmail and
> Bill had mentioned that it was in the development version. Has that
> been
> abandoned altogether? I didn't see it in the current stable release,
> and
> there's b
Back in April of last year I'd asked about Postgres support in vpopmail and
Bill had mentioned that it was in the development version. Has that been
abandoned altogether? I didn't see it in the current stable release, and
there's been a few releases between 04/02 and now. :-)
Regards,
Andrew
27 matches
Mail list logo
