Re: [vchkpw] chkuser wrongly accept emails for default@

2007-05-21 Thread Rick Widmer
Sorry to take so long to put in my comments on this thread... tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Anyway, I'm planning to add an option excluding any acceptance for "default" user (I'm thinking this since two years, but I've forgot to do until now) . This has nothing to do with the bounce string. W

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser wrongly accept emails for default@

2007-04-18 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
This is not a chkuser problem, as chkuser simply uses qmail philosophy, checking for aliases in the qmail way. Anyway, I'm planning to add an option excluding any acceptance for "default" user (I'm thinking this since two years, but I've forgot to do until now) . This has nothing to do with

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser wrongly accept emails for default@

2007-04-18 Thread Jeremy Kister
On 4/17/2007 2:43 PM, Stephane Bouvard (ML) wrote: > Here's a little fix to verify if the alias is not bounce-no-mailbox... [...] > +if (fd_file != -1) { > +read_char = read (fd_file, read_buf, > sizeof(read_buf) - 1); > +close (fd_fi

[vchkpw] chkuser wrongly accept emails for default@

2007-04-17 Thread Stephane Bouvard (ML)
Hi, With chkuser 2.0.8 (not yet updated to 2.0.9, sorry :)), someone reported me that chkuser wrongly accept emails adressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , as there is a .qmail-default "alias" file, even if this file specify bounce-no-mailbox... The same problem occur for any alias defined (why ?) with