Tom Collins wrote:
On May 5, 2004, at 12:25 PM, X-Istence wrote:
ntpdate ntp.nasa.gov before you build the tar ball :P.
Actually, it's more a problem of the CVS server not maintaining the
proper dates on the files used in the build process. It has to do
with relative dates (which files are newe
On May 5, 2004, at 12:25 PM, X-Istence wrote:
ntpdate ntp.nasa.gov before you build the tar ball :P.
Actually, it's more a problem of the CVS server not maintaining the
proper dates on the files used in the build process. It has to do with
relative dates (which files are newer) than absolute dat
Tom Collins wrote:
On May 4, 2004, at 3:31 PM, X-Istence wrote:
Mabey its time to fix your server time.
This shouldnt happen.
If I don't build the tarball correctly, it will happen.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Info o
On May 4, 2004, at 3:31 PM, X-Istence wrote:
Mabey its time to fix your server time.
This shouldnt happen.
If I don't build the tarball correctly, it will happen.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Info on the Sniffter hand-
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 05:31 pm, X-Istence wrote:
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
Mabey its time to fix your server time.
happened to
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 05:31 pm, X-Istence wrote:
> >>have you tried:
> >>>touch *
> >>>in the root of the source tree?
> Mabey its time to fix your server time.
happened to me the other day, which is why I said to touch *
I think there's something wrong with the tarball again *shrugs*
-Jeremy
X-Istence wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 03:28 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
-Jeremy
Thanks for this tip Jeremy; it solved my problem.
Only thing is that I dont understand why. I've looked at man touch, and
I know what i
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 03:28 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
-Jeremy
Thanks for this tip Jeremy; it solved my problem.
Only thing is that I dont understand why. I've looked at man touch, and
I know what it does, but dont unde
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 03:28 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
> have you tried:
> >touch *
> >in the root of the source tree?
> >
> >-Jeremy
>
> Thanks for this tip Jeremy; it solved my problem.
> Only thing is that I dont understand why. I've looked at man touch, and
> I know what it does, but dont under
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
-Jeremy
Thanks for this tip Jeremy; it solved my problem.
Only thing is that I dont understand why. I've looked at man touch, and
I know what it does, but dont understand why and how it solved my
problem(?). Maybe you can clue me in? If
10 matches
Mail list logo
