Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question

2003-08-24 Thread Oden Eriksson
; > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:14 AM > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question > > > >> i *am* using a software PHP accelerator, and there's no good reason > > for > > > >> anyone to run squirrelmail wit

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question

2003-08-24 Thread isp
rver for a while now > > It seems to work very well > > Michael > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:14 AM > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question

2003-08-24 Thread Michael Bowe
I have also been using that software on my server for a while now It seems to work very well Michael - Original Message - From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:14 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmai

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question

2003-08-24 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
i *am* using a software PHP accelerator, and there's no good reason for anyone to run squirrelmail without one - it dramatically reduces CPU demand. for those who may be interested, and also unaware of it, there is a freeware php accelerator out there. it works great, and i highly recommend it

[vchkpw] Re: Webmail question

2003-08-19 Thread Dave Richardson - Lists
You know, if the Squirrel people GPl'd in the option to use sqwebmail direct Maildir access, that would be uber nice! I'm sure its been considered before. I think Squirrel already has options as to which SMTP method you want, and they *did* write their own IMAP interface code. Oh, that *would