Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.24 and Delivered-To header

2003-08-14 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jeff Hedlund wrote: > Charles Sprickman wrote: > > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I wasn't seeing this under 5.3.21... > > What's the problem that has returned? That line should look like: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Isn't that the correct delivery to line (at l

[vchkpw] 5.3.24 and Delivered-To header

2003-08-09 Thread Charles Sprickman
Hi all, It looks like the Delivered-To problem has returned: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wasn't seeing this under 5.3.21... Thanks, Charles

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.24 and Delivered-To header

2003-08-09 Thread Jeff Hedlund
Charles Sprickman wrote: On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jeff Hedlund wrote: Charles Sprickman wrote: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wasn't seeing this under 5.3.21... What's the problem that has returned? That line should look like: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Makes sense to me. Isn't that the c

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.24 and Delivered-To header

2003-08-08 Thread Tom Collins
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 06:01 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: It looks like the Delivered-To problem has returned: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wasn't seeing this under 5.3.21... I assume this is with a catchall... Here's a patch to address that problem. I'm also considering going t

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.24 and Delivered-To header

2003-08-08 Thread Jeff Hedlund
Charles Sprickman wrote: Hi all, It looks like the Delivered-To problem has returned: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wasn't seeing this under 5.3.21... What's the problem that has returned? Isn't that the correct delivery to line (at least for the way vpopmail has handled it, [EMAIL PROTECT