尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:59e8863641491084871729!
On 09/21/2015 03:02 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2015 08:55 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I think that permitting a null password, if policy does not admit it, is a
security hole.
Prefer you you add another explicit call to be called for no password
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2015 08:55 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>> I think that permitting a null password, if policy does not admit it, is a
>> security hole.
>> Prefer you you add another explicit call to be called for no password
>> checking (at all).
>>
>> Regards,
On 09/21/2015 02:26 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 0
Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 1
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/18/2015 09:30 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Applies perfectly! Thanks!
>>
>> On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, M
On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applies perfectly! Thanks!
On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Drew, I know you've put a lot of effor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applies perfectly! Thanks!
On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Drew, I know you've put a lot of effort into these patches, but they do not
/* +/- bytes */
+ storage_t); /* +/- files */
diff -uPr vpopmail-code-1034-trunk.orig/vadduser.c
vpopmail-code-1034-trunk/vadduser.c
--- vpopmail-code-1034-trunk.orig/vadduser.c2010-11-02 17:15:10.0
+
+++ vpopmail-code-1034-trunk/vadduser.c 2015-09-18 15:00:09.815096423 +0100
@@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Drew, I know you've put a lot of effort into these patches, but they do not
succeed against the
5.5.0 trunk. Patches should be made against the most recent revision, which
can be checked out via
Subversion from Sourceforge.
On 09/18/2015 08:11 AM,
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the sn
Pointer to the maildir */
int,/* Must be the int pointed to by 2nd arg to checkquota */
const char *, /* The quota */
- long, /* +/- bytes */
- int); /* +/- files */
+ storage_t, /* +/- bytes */
+ storage_t); /* +/- files */
diff -uPr vpopma
> When spamassassin is enabled but maildrop is not I see failed assertions in
> dovecots POP server[2], which are caused by vdelivermail using a wrong
> filename. The filename, more exactly the S= value is calculated
> _before_ the mail is piped into spamassassin, which adds two more header
> lines
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the sn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
>>> 5.5.0, some of it
>>> had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the snprintf
>>> tidy up's and the
>>> st
On 09/17/2015 04:04 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Was this patch generated with the SVN trunk (5.5.0)?
On 09/17/2015 09:57 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Was this patch generated with the SVN trunk (5.5.0)?
On 09/17/2015 09:57 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> I have
eadquota(const char *dir,const char *quota);
@@ -24,5 +26,5 @@
int maildir_addquota(const char *, /* Pointer to the maildir */
int,/* Must be the int pointed to by 2nd arg to checkquota */
const char *, /* The quota */
- long, /* +/- bytes */
- int);
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> I have created a patch for vpopmail-5.5.0 which incoporates all the changes
> from 5.4.29 to
> 5.4.33, does anyone want this patch or has work in vpopmail-5.5.0 stalled ?
Drew, I'd be happy to take a look a
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c wh
On 09/15/2015 02:26 PM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is mo
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to a
On 09/15/2015 02:26 PM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is mo
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Wh
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Whan I try to use 5.5.0 I found many
bug and
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached.
ginal Message-
From: Drew Wells [mailto:drew-vpopm...@elysium.ltd.uk]
Sent: Tuesday 15 September 2015 11:19
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Segmentation fault in vadduser
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vadduser that causes a
segmentation fault when a password does not pas
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Whan I try to use 5.5.0 I found many
bug and problems tha new features.
Why you need vpopm
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached.
I do not understand the problem.
Of course pa
This is probably why the 5.4.0 is still not considered as stable (the latest
stable version is still 5.4.33)
-Original Message-
From: Drew Wells [mailto:drew-vpopm...@elysium.ltd.uk]
Sent: Tuesday 15 September 2015 11:19
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Segmentation fault
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e55641551049011877!
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there is a bug in vdominfo that means option 'q' does
not work, there is a missing break after the 'q' case. Additionally
vdominfo's output differs from vuserinfo's output in that in vuserinfo
the quota and the quota usage are treated seperatly, I have changed
vdominfo to fix
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x) there seems to be no way of
removing an alias_line using valias, I've added this functionality.
Patch attached.
!DSPAM:55f7e35241555071313485!
diff -uPr vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/valias.c vpopmail-5.5.0/valias.c
--- vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/valias.c2010-
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e35941551360728760!
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vadduser that causes a
segmentation fault when a password does not pass the password_strength
rules. Patch attached.
!DSPAM:55f7e27341551399513616!
diff -uPr vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/vadduser.c vpopmail-5.5.0/vadduser.c
--- vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/vadduser.
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e27941558004510909!
I use the onchange functionality in vpopmail-5.5.0 but find it awkward
that the script is only called once for "add_domain", instead of calling
the script with "add_domain", "add_user" then "mod_user" so have written
a patch to allow this. One side affect is that the order of calls in
vadduser
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e1cc41551654711741!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e0eb41551555158803!
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as when
-e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached.
!DSPAM:55f7df0641553245911066!
diff -uPr vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/vpopmail.c vpopmail-5.5.0/vpopmail
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:5595fb4341556565779328!
Hi all,
Recently I tested vpopmail-5.4.25 / 5.4.33 with maildrop 2.7 / 2.8.2, I
found that it will add a "From " header to the first line of email, like this:
>From r...@helloworld.com Fri Jun 26 06:27:19 2015
However while I use maildrop 2.6, there is no such problem. I found that
vdelivermail.
Hello,
Currently vpopmail doesn't include trashed messages in quota usage.
These are messages that were marked as deleted (IMAP flag \Deleted) but
are still not expunged. These are denoted by the T flag in Maildir:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
It seems two of the popular mail servers o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/10/2014 10:36 AM, John Stile wrote:
> I have not seen any new additions to the mysql table vlog for a long time, so
> I am worried an
> update broke something.
>
> I am using vpopmail-5.4.33-r1, mysql-5.5.40, and netqmail-1.06-r2
>
> I tried t
c:70:4: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects argument of type ‘long long
unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘storage_t’ [-Wformat=]
printf("%s: %llu byte(s) in %llu file(s)\n", *(argv[i]) == '@' ? (argv[i] +
1) : argv[i], uusage, musage);
^
vusagec.c:70:4: war
Hello when I fetch mails i've got
mail is looping
but only in one case
poll imap.gmail.com protocol imap service 993:
user @ pass is "@" here
fetchall idle ssl;
but when I change user in "is section" (of course not alias to user) to
other is working great
vpopmail dont like getting mail
patch method?
>
> Thanks again for your reply.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Peter Brezny
> Purplecat Networks Inc.
> www.purplecat.net
> 828-250-9446
>
> *From:* Tom Collins
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:56 PM
> *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com
>
>
le for qmail admin or something
>> a little more within the source tree than the above patch method?
>>
>> Thanks again for your reply.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Peter Brezny
>> Purplecat Networks Inc.
>> www.purplecat.net
>> 828-250-9446
&g
time variable for qmail admin or something
> a little more within the source tree than the above patch method?
>
> Thanks again for your reply.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Peter Brezny
> Purplecat Networks Inc.
> www.purplecat.net
> 828-250-9446
>
> From: Tom Co
29, 2014 1:56 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
The vchkpw program verifies the password. Are you wondering about the vpasswd
program for changing a password? That's an admin program, and wouldn't
typically enforce a password change policy.
How do your users currently change their
29, 2014 1:56 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
The vchkpw program verifies the password. Are you wondering about the vpasswd
program for changing a password? That's an admin program, and wouldn't
typically enforce a password change policy.
How do your users currently change their
The vchkpw program verifies the password. Are you wondering about the vpasswd
program for changing a password? That's an admin program, and wouldn't
typically enforce a password change policy.
How do your users currently change their passwords? QmailAdmin? Some other
program?
Dear vchkpw@inter7.com,
Is there a way to enforce a minimum length and character combination
(letters, numbers, upper case) with vchkpw and if not, are there patches or
external applications that integrate well with vchkpw to get this
functionality?
Sincerely,
Peter Brezny
Purplecat Networks
Hi,
my setup is as follows: I use Qsmtp[1] to do the SMTP part, use (net)qmail for
the queueing, use vpopmail 5.4.33 for the user/domain stuff. The users get
their mail through IMAP or POP using dovecot. For some users I have maildrop
and/or spamassassin enabled.
When spamassassin is enabled but
On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> On 09/01/2014 01:31 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
>> On 01/09/2014 03:11, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>> Does anyone have any insight or recommendations for how to best use
>>> dovecot's LDA along with vpopmail and qmail? QMT already uses dovecot
>>> for im
On 09/01/2014 01:31 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
On 01/09/2014 03:11, Eric Shubert wrote:
Does anyone have any insight or recommendations for how to best use
dovecot's LDA along with vpopmail and qmail? QMT already uses dovecot
for imap and pop3 services. We're simply looking to take the next
logic
On 01/09/2014 03:11, Eric Shubert wrote:
Does anyone have any insight or recommendations for how to best use
dovecot's LDA along with vpopmail and qmail? QMT already uses dovecot
for imap and pop3 services. We're simply looking to take the next
logical step.
Not answering your question, but:
On 08/31/2014 06:57 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 08/28/2014 10:26 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
On 08/28/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks for this explanation Rick. Now knowing how this actually works, I
think I'll join you in being peeved about it. Not knowing any better, I
would have presu
On 08/28/2014 10:26 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
On 08/28/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks for this explanation Rick. Now knowing how this actually works, I
think I'll join you in being peeved about it. Not knowing any better, I
would have presumed that the user d-q files would have been p
On 08/28/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks for this explanation Rick. Now knowing how this actually works, I
think I'll join you in being peeved about it. Not knowing any better, I
would have presumed that the user d-q files would have been processed
before the domain d-q files. Makes me
Rick,
At issue was that qmail only processes the ".qmail-alias" files in the domain
directory. It then hands off to vdelivermail via the .qmail-default file in
the domain directory.
The vdelivermail program is what parses the "user/.qmail" file for delivery
instructions. While that file foll
On 8/28/2014 7:26 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:24 PM, Rick Widmer wrote:
One thing to remember, and one of my pet peeves...
Out of all of the files in ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/ only one,
.qmail-default has anything to do with the vpopmail delivery process.
When qmail-local tri
On 08/27/2014 11:24 PM, Rick Widmer wrote:
One thing to remember, and one of my pet peeves...
Out of all of the files in ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/ only one,
.qmail-default has anything to do with the vpopmail delivery process.
When qmail-local tries to deliver a message to the domain it
One thing to remember, and one of my pet peeves...
Out of all of the files in ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/ only one,
.qmail-default has anything to do with the vpopmail delivery process.
When qmail-local tries to deliver a message to the domain it looks at
all of the .qmail-* files in the d
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> On 08/25/2014 05:48 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>>> >I block the spam before it enters the system using simscan.
>> Thanks - not an option here since I need to allow users to opt in or out,
>> etc.
>
> The simcontrol file allows you to custo
On 08/25/2014 05:48 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>I block the spam before it enters the system using simscan.
Thanks - not an option here since I need to allow users to opt in or out, etc.
The simcontrol file allows you to customize settings per email address.
I presume that this would be the
On Aug 26, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-08-25 8:48 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>> On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-25 2:55 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
A quick question, curious about w
Hi,
On 2014-08-25 8:48 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-08-25 2:55 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
A quick question, curious about what others are doing…
We still use qmailadmin with our vpopmail setup, because it does ha
Charles,
It's been a long time since I've worked in that code, but here are some quick
thoughts:
1) There's already code reading the headers, searching for mail loops by
looking at the Delivered-To header. You could tap into that code.
2) You could look at simscan.c to see how they're interfa
On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-08-25 2:55 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> A quick question, curious about what others are doing…
>>
>> We still use qmailadmin with our vpopmail setup, because it does handle all
>> the basics pretty well.
Hi,
On 2014-08-25 2:55 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
A quick question, curious about what others are doing…
We still use qmailadmin with our vpopmail setup, because it does handle all the
basics pretty well. One weakness that’s giving us grief is forwarding. Since
qmailadmin has
Hello all,
A quick question, curious about what others are doing…
We still use qmailadmin with our vpopmail setup, because it does handle all the
basics pretty well. One weakness that’s giving us grief is forwarding. Since
qmailadmin has no option to both pipe the mail through the spam scanne
Voc� pode comprar direto BOTAS de prote��o e seguran�a para sua empresa ou para voc� revender. Entre no site. http://www.calcadodeseguranca.net Fone 051 92253005
!DSPAM:53fb869e56441580318159!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks, Teodor! I'll take a look at this.
On 07/03/2014 10:36 AM, Teodor Milkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading to vpopmail 5.4.33 I started seeing much more IO requests. I
> see that in 5.4.32
> the following code was added to maildirquota.c:
>
Hi,
After upgrading to vpopmail 5.4.33 I started seeing much more IO
requests. I see that in 5.4.32 the following code was added to
maildirquota.c:
/*
Maildir++ specification says to rebuild the maildirsize file if the
file is 5120 or more bytes, or is more than 15 minutes old
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
vchkpw@inter7.com mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at vchkpw-ow...@inter7.com.
Acknowledgment: I have added the address
arch...@mail-archive.com
to the vchkpw mailing list.
Welcome to vchkpw@inter7.com!
P
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
vchkpw@inter7.com mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at vchkpw-ow...@inter7.com.
To confirm that you would like
arch...@mail-archive.com
added to the vchkpw mailing list, please send
an empty reply to th
//www.abac-info.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Envoyé : jeudi 24 avril 2014 19:46
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Rrdirection
problem
That could very well be, Tom.
Stéphane, I believe the
Stéphane,
try in this way:
* delete the forward ss...@piemont.fr
* create one normal account ss...@piemont.fr
* insert within this account a forward to spa...@piemont.fr
In this way it should work.
Tonino
Il 24/04/2014 19:45, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
That could very well be, Tom.
Stépha
e
11100 Narbonne
Tél: 33 (0)4 68 41 73 00
FAX : 33 (0)4 6841 73 02
GSM: 33 (0)6 85 36 67 28
http://www.abac-info.com
-Message d'origine-
De : xaf [mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SP
Coupe
> 11100 Narbonne
>
> Tél: 33 (0)4 68 41 73 00
> FAX : 33 (0)4 6841 73 02
> GSM: 33 (0)6 85 36 67 28
>
> http://www.abac-info.com
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : xaf [mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
> Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
> À : vchkp
ine-
De : xaf [mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM]
Rrdirection problem
|--> Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
>> 3) what you desire to happen
>> > When
On 04/18/2014 06:41 PM, xaf wrote:
|--> Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that the message
go to the ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr mail box and foward to spa...@piemont.fr
And when i send a mass
|--> Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
>> 3) what you desire to happen
>> > When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that the
>> > message go to the ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr mail box and foward to
>> > spa...@piemont.fr
>> >
>> > And when i send a massage to ss.
4 6841 73 02
GSM: 33 (0)6 85 36 67 28
http://www.abac-info.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Envoyé : jeudi 17 avril 2014 17:50
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Rrdirection problem
Stéphane,
This does not app
matique
1 Bis Ave Pech Loubat
ZI La Coupe
11100 Narbonne
Tél: 33 (0)4 68 41 73 00
FAX : 33 (0)4 6841 73 02
GSM: 33 (0)6 85 36 67 28
http://www.abac-info.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Envoyé : jeudi 17 avril 2014 17:50
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet
Il 17/04/2014 21:48, Remo Mattei ha scritto:
Hi Jeremy I tried your patch against 1.06 here is the output maybe you can help
out.
The Jeremy's patch should be apply starting from qmail-1.03. Please,
read "TO INSTALL" note.
Ciao
--
Alessio Cecchi is:
@ ILS -> http://www.linux.it/~alessice/
Il 17/04/2014 20:39, Jeremy Kister ha scritto:
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06
so I plan to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I
want to add chkuser and tls but also few others like the c
On 04/17/2014 11:33 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I plan
to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I want to add
chkuser and tls but also few others like the channel since gmail and others
have been rea
Hi Jeremy I tried your patch against 1.06 here is the output maybe you can help
out.
Thanks
rw-r--r-- 1 root root 167 Apr 17 13:41 cdbmake_add.c.rej
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 236 Apr 17 13:41 cdb_seek.c.rej
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 459 Apr 17 13:42 dns.c.rej
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 312 Apr 17 1
On 4/17/2014 2:52 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Nice does it have tls?
no TLS; i use all SSL. o well. :)
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
!DSPAM:5350261b34264808310748!
Nice does it have tls?
Inviato da iPhone ()
> Il giorno Apr 17, 2014, alle ore 11:39, Jeremy Kister
> ha scritto:
>
>> On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Hello all
>> I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I
>> plan to recomp it and I have vpopmail w
Do u know what does this patch include will it work on netqmail 1.06?
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone ()
> Il giorno Apr 17, 2014, alle ore 11:39, Jeremy Kister
> ha scritto:
>
>> On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Hello all
>> I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmai
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I plan
to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I want to add
chkuser and tls but also few others like the channel since gmail and others
have been reall
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I plan
to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I want to add
chkuser and tls but also few others like the channel since gmail and others
have been really a pain does anyone suggest a set of patch
Stéphane,
This does not appear to me to be what was written on the QMT list.
In order to be clear, please describe:
1) your configuration (what are accounts, what are forwards)
2) what actually happens
3) what you desire to happen
For example:
1) There are 2 email accounts, ss...@piemont.fr and
On Apr 14, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> On 04/14/2014 03:32 PM, Tom Ierna wrote:
>> In any case, I'm again looking into how to make a domain on one of my
>> vpopmail/qmail servers use
>> the "+" separator for subaddresses, rather than "-", and I'm coming up dry.
>> I realize that
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/14/2014 03:32 PM, Tom Ierna wrote:
> In any case, I'm again looking into how to make a domain on one of my
> vpopmail/qmail servers use
> the "+" separator for subaddresses, rather than "-", and I'm coming up dry. I
> realize that
> changing th
1 - 100 of 20149 matches
Mail list logo
