Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser - rejects legit mail, when followed by bad e-mail

2010-10-11 Thread U. George
On 10/11/2010 05:11 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote: To accept these types of badly formatted messages, use fixcrio (which you'll have to check if your TLS patch patched). Well, it appears that the errors, 2 (5xx) perm, and 1 (4xx) try again err, are ignored by the spammer. And ignored by qmail. I d

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser - rejects legit mail, when followed by bad e-mail

2010-10-08 Thread U. George
chkuser-2.0.9-release.patch On 10/08/2010 12:23 PM, Rick Romero wrote: What version of chkuser are you running? !DSPAM:4caf6d0332711107294771!

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser - rejects legit mail, when followed by bad e-mail

2010-10-08 Thread U. George
rvers sending a mix of valid and invalid addresses in the same message. Also, addresses are processed by chkuser in whatever order the sending server provides them. Sequence is of no significance. U. George wrote: the first e-mail rcpt is legit. It appears that if more rcpts follow, and those acc

[vchkpw] chkuser - rejects legit mail, when followed by bad e-mail

2010-10-08 Thread U. George
the first e-mail rcpt is legit. It appears that if more rcpts follow, and those accounts dont exist, then the first legit e-mail is not processed, as is rejected with all the other bogus attempts to send e-mail the domain. The chkuser test process appears to try a fake e-mail, and then a legit