Thanks, and to Matt also.
On 8/3/12 11:18 AM, "Eric Shubert" wrote:
>> * I think Windows sucks bad, and I like UNIX only without a UI. I'm very
>> good in vi. But for running my server this time I'd like to try a UI for a
>> for vanilla file management and such, and I don't think I want it to
Kurt
On 8/3/12 5:37 AM, "Postmaster" wrote:
> WHAT! - no pdp-8 :)
>
> On 08/03/12 06:52, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> * After the UNIVAC 1108, the IBM 360, the PDP-11, and the Apple II, the Mac
>> was my next computer
>
>
>
>
>
!DSPAM:50208d2034211484845289!
targeted at FreeBSD, but I'm fairly confident the instructions are OSX
> friendly. At least in the past they were.
>
> http://www.tnpi.net/internet/mail/toaster/
>
> Rick
>
> Quoting Kurt Bigler :
>
>
>> ***
>>
>> I would consider running
Geez, people are always so opinionatedly curious. Does it every occur to
anyone that some people are different than other people, and that that, as
well as technical issues can actually influence choices? I don't pretend to
be purely rational. Have you all tried using OSX for a server? Or do yo
I run a small server currently with
qmail-1.03 + qmailadmin 1.2.8 + vpopmail 5.4.10
qmail-1.03 has the chkuser patch applied (not a recent version). Although
it did not help my problem I also just applied Christopher K. Davis qmail
patch (to qmail-smtpd only) because I hoped it would resolve
for taking extra bandwidth due to my typo.
-Kurt
On 3/6/11 10:42 PM, "Kurt Bigler" wrote:
> Rick et al,
>
> On 3/6/11 9:30 PM, "Rick Widmer" wrote:
>
>> On 3/6/2011 10:13 PM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm in a tim
Rick et al,
On 3/6/11 9:30 PM, "Rick Widmer" wrote:
> On 3/6/2011 10:13 PM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm in a time-sensitive bind in which I need to set something up quickly for
>> a user in my existing qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin system (w
s what Rick suggested and I'm
trying that with no luck so far.
-Kurt
On 3/6/11 9:29 PM, "Tren Blackburn" wrote:
> You can deliver directly to the Maildir via a forward. Details are in the man
> pages.
>
> HTH,
>
> Tren
>
> - Original Message --
Hi,
I'm in a time-sensitive bind in which I need to set something up quickly for
a user in my existing qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin system (which has a little
procmail sprinkled in).
The goal is to create a new forward or forwarding account that forwards to
this user's existing account but bypasses
erver. If I change it manually to vpopmail it changes back to
root when the next POP occurs. I don't know whether this indicates any
actual problem, since the smtprules and SMTP-after-POP seems to be working
ok, but I thought I'd mention it.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts abo
it'll build file list and
> transfer everything over.
>
> You may get some warnings and/or errors from rsync saying "Some files
> could not be transfered" that's because some files your trying to
> transfer are currently being used, etc. To stop that, simply cutoff the
&
es and so can't use vdeldomain?
(b) On the new server, is there any advantage (or necessity) to accepting
delivery for the domains but deferring the actual local delivery until the
old POP contents are copied over first?
Thanks for any thoughts.
-Kurt Bigler
on 3/27/06 1:36 PM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> So what *should* I do now with all my old-style domain aliases? Do I
>> have
>> to mess with the qmail config files by hand?
>
> Edit the users/assi
on 3/27/06 11:45 AM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> I'm sure. I triple checked. I have a text file of the shell session.
>> I've
>> attached a contiguous unedited excerpt from the shell session.
&g
on 3/23/06 9:40 PM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> on 10/18/05 10:35 PM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Oct 18, 2005, at 6:45 PM, Jeff Salisbury wrote:
>>>> FYI, I am
[was: How do I list alias domains, and remove alias domains?]
on 10/18/05 10:35 PM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2005, at 6:45 PM, Jeff Salisbury wrote:
>> FYI, I am using version 5.3.5 of the vpopmail tools...
>
> Try upgrading to something in the 5.4 series. vdeldomain
27; /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/admin
What do you mean by "unable to send emails to that domain"? You get bounce
messages? Or messages just disappear? Or the messages are not there when
you try to pop them?
-Kurt Bigler
Reviving a thread fromt the qmailadmin list a couple months back. Looks
like this particular topic really belongs on the vchkpw list...
on 7/19/05 10:34 PM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 7/19/05 9:20 AM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> An e
on 4/15/05 11:55 AM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2005, at 1:30 PM, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>> RFC requires that you have postmaster and abuse addresses.
>>
>> http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-postmaster.php
>> http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-abuse.php
>
> Should we make some u
on 4/12/05 11:22 AM, Aran Clary Deltac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been running a dedicated gentoo server for about a year now. All
> e-mail has been handled by qmail and delivered to local user accounts. I
> have the possibility of hosting a client that requires 10k+ e-mail
> accounts. I
on 4/11/05 11:23 PM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> password changing via sqwebmail is failing as per this maillog entry:
>
> sqwebmaild: authdaemon: s_connect() failed: Permission denied
>
> Searching the sqwebmail archives for the above maillog error reveals t
I installed courier-authlib because sqwebmail now requires it. This is a
pure vchkpw auth situation.
The courier-authlib install provides these two options for its ./configure
--with-mailuser=userid, --with-mailgroup=groupid
I decided to omit these options because of the following statement
on 4/8/05 10:38 PM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> But it strikes me that if a .qmail- file contains for example
>> exactly
>> the same thing as .qmail-default, this would not hurt system behavior
>> at
use .qmail-alias or valias, because both mechanisms work
at a level that occurs prior to what happens inside the user directory.
> On Apr 7, 2005 12:41 AM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If I were to implement this, as a option to vdelivermail, say:
>>> -d Deli
on 4/6/05 11:30 PM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 4/6/05 10:41 PM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So with this change, you can now have the following line in your user/.qmail
>> file:
>>
>> | myfilter | vdelivermail -d bounce-
on 4/6/05 10:41 PM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So with this change, you can now have the following line in your user/.qmail
> file:
>
> | myfilter | vdelivermail -d bounce-no-mailbox
Well, not quite. You have to wrap this in a simple command, e.g.
on 4/5/05 5:41 PM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 4/5/05 6:28 AM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> | preline yourfilter | maildir /path/to/vpopdomains/`echo $USER | tr A-Z
>> a-z`/`echo $EXT | tr A-Z a-z`/Maildir/
>
> Thanks, that&#x
on 4/6/05 6:04 AM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 6 at 02:50 AM, quoth danielcm:
>>
>> I don't think it needs to be that complicated, all I have is:
>> | preline yourfilter | /usr/local/bin/maildir.sh ./Maildir/
>>
>> My maildir.sh file is:
>> exec /usr/bin/safec
on 4/5/05 6:28 AM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 5 at 01:24 AM, quoth Kurt Bigler:
>>
>> I have been able to prototype my filtering functionality in a .qmail-user
>> file in one of my domain directories as follows:
>>
>> | my
relinining and other functionality
associated with the user/.qmail file.
In the mean time, what is the best (simplest, most reliable) way to achieve
this simplistic delivery functionality?
Thanks in advance.
-Kurt Bigler
t
blah will probably depend on having a .qmail-blah file in order to run the
filter, and I want to know now if I am in big trouble here because blah
resend to blah will be rejected due to the looping rule.
Thanks for any help.
-Kurt Bigler
on 3/28/05 5:53 PM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2005, at 4:26 PM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> The qmail doc says:
>>> qmail-lspawn invokes qmail-local asynchronously, so the
>>> results may not be in the same order as the commands.
>&
t I could execute commands freely in various .qmail files without having
to worry about using locks.
Is there any kind of implicit protection against such issues?
Thanks. I realize this is more of a qmail question than a vpopmail
question, but I'd appreciate any responses.
-Kurt Bigler
to make it safe for me to edit .qmail files by hand. My best guess
is that for $HOME I should substitute:
the directory containing the .qmail file in question
and a single empirical test seems to confirm this. Is this correct as a
general rule?
Thanks,
Kurt Bigler
on 3/13/05 10:18 AM, YaP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw this new package on the website but i can't find vpopmaild daemon,
> there's just the file in the cvs. Is cvs the only way to obtain it?
>
> Thanks in advance
This was covered in the recent thread "vhostadmin development release". The
on 3/3/05 12:03 PM, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2005, at 8:54 AM, Nick Harring wrote:
>> No, it wouldn't require this. It would require that you edit the
>> recipient list prior to queueing. There's nothing 'ugly' that I can see
>> about that process.
>
> I think Nick's met
on 3/3/05 8:54 AM, Nick Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Simscan isn't replacing qmail-smtpd, so this isn't strictly an smtp
>>> limitation. Perhaps I'm just not getting it, but why wouldn't the
>>> following work:
>>> Email comes in for users A, B and C. A and B have an SA threshold of
> 5,
on 2/28/05 5:02 PM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 2/28/05 7:06 AM, Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> We are almost ready to release a new php web interface that talks to the
>> vpopmail daemon where we planned on adding support for this s
on 2/28/05 7:06 AM, Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 February 2005 2:42 am, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> How are you planning on making per-user options available to individual
>> users for editing? I thought I had read something about using SqWebmail
>>
e?
How are you planning on making per-user options available to individual
users for editing? I thought I had read something about using SqWebmail for
this but I can not find the message now and can find no other confirmation,
and the SqWebmail info does not seem to mention any support for spamassasin.
Looking forward to having this feature rolled into 5.4.
Thanks.
-Kurt Bigler
on 4/2/04 6:24 PM, X-Istence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kurt Bigler wrote:
>
>>
>> I confirmed that if I kill this process (line from ps output):
>>
>> qmaild86243 0.0 0.1 904 360 ?? SNJ 3:05PM 0:00.09
>> tcpserver -v -H -R -lv
on 4/2/04 1:15 PM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is regarding qmail + vpopmail 5.3.12 running under tcpserver, on
> FreeBSD 4.6.1.
>
> My server was bouncing *everything* with 5.7.1, that is including stuff that
> should have been delivered to domains hosted
on 4/2/04 2:05 PM, Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 4/2/04 1:53 PM, X-Istence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Kurt Bigler wrote:
>>> Thanks for any thoughts, and sorry to be so lacking in info. I did do a
>>> quick ps when I discovere
on 4/2/04 1:53 PM, X-Istence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> This is regarding qmail + vpopmail 5.3.12 running under tcpserver, on
>> FreeBSD 4.6.1.
>>
>> My server was bouncing *everything* with 5.7.1, that is including stuff that
>>
only
remembered it should have been there after rebooting and doing another ps.
Is there some default mode for smtp connections that takes over under such a
circumstance?
Thanks,
Kurt Bigler
on 1/31/04 9:46 PM, Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 23:39, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> I just discovered a phenomenon that is probably familiar to many of you:
>> the fact that spammers (or viruses) can relay through my server because of
&g
changes I make there
will either be blown away, or worse yet, intervere with qmailadmin/vpopmail
operation.
Thanks for any experience or thoughts on this.
-Kurt Bigler
ks for any suggestions.
-Kurt Bigler
he bounce message). And thus I an using
the list again [EMAIL PROTECTED] the off-list conversation!
Thanks,
Kurt Bigler
e in how
domain aliases were handled, but without explaining the underlying mechanics
fully, so I had to post here to find out.
Here is the message I posted about my problem, and the response I got:
on 6/5/03 7:04 PM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
> I have an alias domain that exists and appears to
rt_005_0001_BNOJVXEC.BDBQJPGV"
"faith" is neither an account nor a forward for the domain in question, and
so should bounce. If I send to that address, either locally or via another
SMTP it bounces.
So how can a message "To" that address end up "Delivered-To" me?
I am using:
vpopmail 5.3.12
qmail 1.03
qmailadmin 1.0.6
Thanks for any help.
-Kurt Bigler
g vpopmail-5.3.12.
Thanks,
Kurt Bigler
on 12/26/02 6:22 PM, George Minich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seasons Greetings to all on the list! I have a question that deals with
> qmail/vpopmail and multiple domains. I have configured a second domain
> using the vqadmin.cgi. When I look at the various config file and directory
> struct
on 12/26/02 6:22 PM, George Minich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seasons Greetings to all on the list! I have a question that deals with
> qmail/vpopmail and multiple domains. I have configured a second domain
> using the vqadmin.cgi. When I look at the various config file and directory
> struct
d
> from /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster that could parse where the
> bounce came from and put it into the correct postmaster's mailbox. It
> would be easier than hacking the qmail/vpopmail source code.
I have not tried implementing this however.
It does seem to me to be a deficiency in qmail+vpopmail that the bounce
message is not sent from the correct domain. Do others agree?
Kurt Bigler
on 12/22/02 9:07 PM, Hugo Escobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 00:17, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> on 12/22/02 5:37 PM, Hugo Escobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi list:
>>>
>>> Sorry if this is off-topic
on 12/22/02 5:37 PM, Hugo Escobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi list:
>
> Sorry if this is off-topic but the sqwebmail ml-manager seems to be
> discarding message postings.
>
> This is what I have so far:
>
> Vpopmail+mysql working fine.
>
> $ telnet 110
>
> always works for all the vir
on 12/22/02 5:37 PM, Hugo Escobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi list:
>
> Sorry if this is off-topic but the sqwebmail ml-manager seems to be
> discarding message postings.
>
> This is what I have so far:
>
> Vpopmail+mysql working fine.
>
> $ telnet 110
>
> always works for all the vir
on 12/4/02 2:02 PM, Brendan McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an easy way to remove a number of email accounts using
> vdeluser all at once?
>
> My problem is thisI want to remove several thousand mail accounts
> from my server, but I don't want to manually run vdeluser for each
it, and tries to meet an impossible goal. It is good to be aware of both
all the time. The "best" of us (and who is that anyway?) will miss the
obvious often enough whether writing or reading.
Thanks,
Kurt Bigler
can behave differently
for new accounts that have not previously been used. Would be interested if
anyone else has solved this problem. I am new to this list - maybe the
issue has been brought up before.
-Kurt Bigler
the symlink and delete the original domain.
So what is the right way to delete an alias domain using vpopmail?
Thanks,
Kurt Bigler
62 matches
Mail list logo
