Just noticed that none of domainkey-signature in mails to vchkpw
mailling list verify. Looks like the dspam headers are the culprit. Is
it possible to have the headers above the domainkey-signature header?
--
Manvendra Bhangui
www.indimail.org
!DSPAM:49d4491832681995072061!
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, John Simpson wrote:
> the only problem i see at the moment is how the FHS stuff is going to
> affect where the files are. i want the program to self-adjust to "FHS
> layout" or "built from source layout" automatically, which means i'll need
> to be able to tell eit
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:47 PM, aledr wrote:
>>
>> I'm already packaging vpopmail on my home repo on openSUSE Build
>> Service, you can check the spec file there at home:aledr.
>>
> Just took a look at it. Looks like a good starting poin
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:47 PM, aledr wrote:
> I'm already packaging vpopmail on my home repo on openSUSE Build
> Service, you can check the spec file there at home:aledr.
>
> Just took a look at it. Looks like a good starting point. I also see that
you have netqmail. Why don't you include netqm
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM, aledr wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Manvendra Bhangui
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have worked extensively last few months in building RPM for my project.
>>> So I can work with anyone who is doing
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> 5.5 is moving towards an initialization type function, but there isn't
> one as of yet. It will most likely end up being a part of the config
> file API.
maybe something like this in all programs having main()
if (vpopmailuid == -1 || v
why package vpopmail without qmail ?
I'm already packaging vpopmail on my home repo on openSUSE Build
> Service, you can check the spec file there at home:aledr.
>
> --
> [ ]'s
> Aledr - Alexandre
>
>
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
e-mail/msn: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
sip: ita...@isp
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Manvendra Bhangui
> wrote:
>>
>> I have worked extensively last few months in building RPM for my project.
>> So I can work with anyone who is doing this for vpopmail.
>> For the RPM installation, it is
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
wrote:
> qmail is not FHS
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Manvendra Bhangui
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I want to create rpm for qmal and vpopmail.
>>>
>>> anyone can
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto <
ita...@ispbrasil.com.br> wrote:
> qmail is not FHS
>
hmm. Looks like a difficult task (but not impossible). The equivalent of
prefix is is the file conf-qmail
then you have the following directories
alias
control
queue
users
boot
where shoul
qmail is not FHS
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto <
> ita...@ispbrasil.com.br> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I want to create rpm for qmal and vpopmail.
>>
>> anyone can help me porting qmail build system to gnu auto-tools ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Simpson wrote:
> isn't there some kind of "vinit()" function which every program is
> required to call before calling any other vpopmail library function?
They're supposed to call vauth_open(), but this is an authentication
module function. It w
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto <
ita...@ispbrasil.com.br> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to create rpm for qmal and vpopmail.
>
> anyone can help me porting qmail build system to gnu auto-tools ?
>
There are few who have already built rpm for qmail. Why reinvent the wheel?
or do you
Hi
I want to create rpm for qmal and vpopmail.
anyone can help me porting qmail build system to gnu auto-tools ?
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
e-mail/msn: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+55 11 4063 5033
+55 34 3221 8599
!DSPAM:49d397
On 2009-04-01, at 0955, Matt Brookings wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
here's an idea... why not include a utility which sets the ownerships
and permissions correctly?
Ironically, this particular part of the vpopmail build system, I'm
trying *not* to change. I'd like the ./configure && make && mak
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, John Simpson wrote:
> maybe it doesn't need to be part of the build/packaging process, but it
> *is* something people need after the system is installed and running,
> because people *do* tweak their files by hand sometimes, and they may forget
> (or not know how)
On 2009-04-01, at 0725, Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:52 PM, John Simpson wrote:
here's an idea... why not include a utility which sets the
ownerships and
permissions correctly?
Actually the program is not needed.
sorry, the "vfixpermissions" script on my site gets
On 2009-03-31, at 2252, Rick Widmer wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
so it looks like the only non-trivial thing which hasn't been
covered already is updating the vpasswd file and running
"vmkpasswd" to rebuild the vpasswd.cdb file.
As long as you don't have any ezmlm mailing lists... I believe
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
> I have worked extensively last few months in building RPM for my project.
> So I can work with anyone who is doing this for vpopmail.
> For the RPM installation, it is a good practice to set the permission for
> every file/directory under
I have worked extensively last few months in building RPM for my project. So
I can work with anyone who is doing this for vpopmail.
For the RPM installation, it is a good practice to set the permission for
every file/directory under the %files section. It shouldn't be done under
%pre or %post secti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Simpson wrote:
> here's an idea... why not include a utility which sets the ownerships
> and permissions correctly?
Ironically, this particular part of the vpopmail build system, I'm
trying *not* to change. I'd like the ./configure && make && ma
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
> > if [ " $(DESTDIR)" = " " ] ; then \
> > if test `...@idcommand@` != "0" ; then \
> > echo "you are not root"; \
> > exit 1;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
> if [ " $(DESTDIR)" = " " ] ; then \
> if test `...@idcommand@` != "0" ; then \
> echo "you are not root"; \
> exit 1; \
> fi ; \
This was basically what I was planning on doing. I
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:52 PM, John Simpson wrote:
> On 2009-03-30, at 0844, Matt Brookings wrote:
>
>>
>> I think the build system needs is a way to stop the -o and -g statements
>> when building a package, and to use them when not. Most everyone has
>> been installing vpopmail from source, a
John.
for me sounds good, wonderful
here's an idea... why not include a utility which sets the ownerships and
permissions correctly?
>
> for RPM users, the program would be called called a post-install script to
> ensure that the newly created directory structure has the proper ownership
> and
On 2009-03-30, at 0844, Matt Brookings wrote:
I think the build system needs is a way to stop the -o and -g
statements
when building a package, and to use them when not. Most everyone has
been installing vpopmail from source, and I have a feeling many will
continue
to. We can't remove set
26 matches
Mail list logo
