Re: [vchkpw] Two qmails in same machine

2007-11-11 Thread Christopher Chan
Both qmail-smtpd instances can share the tcp.smtp.cdb file without trouble. Now that you actually brought up routing...I see that I have made a mistake. You must do your scanning with the /var/qmail instance or which ever vpopmail does it changes on. The other qmail instance must be the one t

Re: [vchkpw] Two qmails in same machine

2007-11-11 Thread Christopher Chan
All that is needed is identical assign, rcpthosts and virtualdomains files for mail delivery and acceptance. Patched qmails may or may not need a bit more. I am retracting this comment if the setup is for one qmail instance to pass the mail to another qmail instance instead of both deliverin

Re: [vchkpw] Two qmails in same machine

2007-11-11 Thread Christopher Chan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK then so I could have a box in wich I do... take qmail sources and patch them with johns (great and nice) patch... make setup check and ./config-fast fqdn after this after this change /var/qmail for /var/qmail-scanning-server in conf-local... and again ./config-fast

Re: [vchkpw] Two qmails in same machine

2007-11-11 Thread Christopher Chan
Joshua Megerman wrote: On Friday 09 November 2007 04:52:16 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK then so I could have a box in wich I do... take qmail sources and patch them with johns (great and nice) patch... make setup check and ./config-fast fqdn after this after this change /var/qmail for /var

Re: [vchkpw] smtp after pop

2007-11-11 Thread ckubu
Hi > > I have vpopmail running with smtp-after-pop functionality > > (--enable-roaming-users). the pop-daemon is from qmail. this works fine > > for normal (unsecure) connection via port 110. but this doesn't work if > > connecting via strunnel on port 995. I know, thats correct, because > > stunn