On Wednesday 18 May 2005 02:57 pm, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 9:46:30 PM, Jeremy wrote:
> >> http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/patches/tcpserver-mysql.shtml
> >
> > that's a hack, and I would not recommend using it.
> >
> > it's not tcpserver's job to handle
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 9:46:30 PM, Jeremy wrote:
>> http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/patches/tcpserver-mysql.shtml
> that's a hack, and I would not recommend using it.
> it's not tcpserver's job to handle specific functions such as this.
However sometimes you have to do sth even if
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 01:50 pm, Davide Giunchi wrote:
> Payal Rathod ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> > The other day a friend showed interest in qmail server. He is running
> > sendmail for many years and wants to shift to a better MTA (for his
> > moderately loaded server of 3 thousand users) during hard
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 01:26 pm, Payal Rathod wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:15:22PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > don't use vpopmail's roaming-users functionality if you want
> > pop-before-smtp authentication, use Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl
> > package.
>
> Any particular reason why?
v
Payal Rathod ha scritto:
Hi,
The other day a friend showed interest in qmail server. He is running
sendmail for many years and wants to shift to a better MTA (for his
moderately loaded server of 3 thousand users) during hardware change. I
have advised him qmail + vpopmail combo, but am scared of
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 8:26:08 PM, Payal wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:15:22PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>> don't use vpopmail's roaming-users functionality if you want
>> pop-before-smtp authentication, use Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl
>> package.
> Any particular reason why?
beca
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:15:22PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> don't use vpopmail's roaming-users functionality if you want
> pop-before-smtp authentication, use Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl
> package.
Any particular reason why?
> However, I wouldn't even use pop-before-smtp.. I would set up S
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 12:45 pm, Payal Rathod wrote:
> Hi,
> The other day a friend showed interest in qmail server. He is running
> sendmail for many years and wants to shift to a better MTA (for his
> moderately loaded server of 3 thousand users) during hardware change. I
> have advised him qma
Hi,
The other day a friend showed interest in qmail server. He is running
sendmail for many years and wants to shift to a better MTA (for his
moderately loaded server of 3 thousand users) during hardware change. I
have advised him qmail + vpopmail combo, but am scared of one thing
only. Can cdb
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:54:15AM -0500, DAve wrote:
> Payal Rathod wrote:
> We have been very happy with the smtp-auth that is included in the
> contrib directory of vpopmail. It uses vchkpw so checking against the
> system users, vpopmail users in cdb, vpopmail users in SQL, all work
> fine.
Hello ,
This patch makes vpopbull work with multiple domains in the argument
The base 5.4.10 only processes the first domain due to nested use of
strtok
--- ../vpopmail-5.4.10-IPLNet-9/vpopbull.c 2004-01-11 09:16:53.0
+
+++ vpopbull.c 2005-05-18 14:00:30.0 +0100
@@
On Wednesday, May 18 at 09:12 AM, quoth Payal Rathod:
Can someone tell me which kind of SMTP-Auth patch (or qmail-smtpd
replacement) integrates properly with vpopmail+qmail setup?
I don't want to use mailfront for the same but I am open to other ideas
where SMTP-Auth module can check the passwor
Payal Rathod wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell me which kind of SMTP-Auth patch (or qmail-smtpd
replacement) integrates properly with vpopmail+qmail setup?
I don't want to use mailfront for the same but I am open to other ideas
where SMTP-Auth module can check the password from vpasswd files of
vpopm
Hi,
Can someone tell me which kind of SMTP-Auth patch (or qmail-smtpd
replacement) integrates properly with vpopmail+qmail setup?
I don't want to use mailfront for the same but I am open to other ideas
where SMTP-Auth module can check the password from vpasswd files of
vpopmail.
Thanks for the
At 10.48 18/05/2005, you wrote:
I currently have no problems
with email logging. I have also got the rblsmtpd syslogd patch working
its only the chkuser stuff that does not end up in
syslog.
This is my configuration for qmail-smtpd. It logs everything (chkuser
included).
I don't use supervise,
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 08.52 18/05/2005, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail
problem (as
> chkuser uses same logg
Thanks that worked really well!
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 08.52 18/05/2005, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail
probl
At 08.52 18/05/2005, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail
problem (as
> chkuser uses same logging routines of qmail). chkus
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail
problem (as
> chkuser uses same logging routines of qmail). chkuser log goes whenever
> qmail log
19 matches
Mail list logo
