Re: [vchkpw] NFS / Disk Access / Load Concerns on Vpopmail cluster

2004-07-05 Thread Eric Ziegast
> What we're seeing is that our network and RAID 5 IDE-based disk array on > our central mail store server is not able to keep up with the 'client' > servers doing the POP3, IMAP, Webmail, and SMTP legwork. I've found an interesting bottleneck with webmail. When people use POP or IMAP clients (Ou

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Monday 05 July 2004 08:44 pm, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 10 -r relays.ordb.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r > > dnsbl.njabl.org \ > > -r opm.blitzed.org -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r > > blackholes.mail-abuse.org > > What happens in th

Re: [vchkpw] NFS / Disk Access / Load Concerns on Vpopmail cluster

2004-07-05 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Monday 05 July 2004 03:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This mail store server is responsible for the store of the > vpopmail/domains directory (NFS mounted by the 'client servers') and run > SQL select queries to verify passwords... The read / writes on the disks > are reaching the limit of t

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Monday 05 July 2004 02:51 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What I'd like to know is what some of you other admins are using -- are > there any we are missing that are effective? Has anyone found that one of > the above is not providing any usefulness and could be dropped? I use sbl-xbl.spamhaus.

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Joe Boyce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I'd like to know is what some of you other admins are using -- are there any we are missing that are effective? Has anyone found that one of the above is not providing any usefulness and could be dropped? We're currently using: bl.spamcop.net sbl.spamhaus.org zombie.dn

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Eduardo M. Bragatto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 10 -r relays.ordb.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r dnsbl.njabl.org \ -r opm.blitzed.org -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r blackholes.mail-abuse.org What happens in the case that more than one RBL has the same blocked address? Which one actually blocks

RE: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread techs
Mario: We call rblsmtpd through tcpserver. This is the section of our tcpserver shell start script: /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 10 -r relays.ordb.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r dnsbl.njabl.org \ -r opm.blitzed.org -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r blackholes.mail-abuse.org Hope this answers your quest

[vchkpw] Hostname Problems

2004-07-05 Thread mike
Hey, I just recently reinstalled qmail/vpopmail/courier-imap/courier-pop3d and for some reason on all the virtual domains when someone sends an email from outside the server to my server it appends the email addresses with zarx.net, which is the first domain on the server. Here is an example: Hi.

RE: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Mário Gamito
Hi, Just asking... do you put all those in qmail-smtpd, or do you use another method ? Regards, Mário Gamito > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 8:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [vchkpw] RBLs > > Hello! > >

[vchkpw] NFS / Disk Access / Load Concerns on Vpopmail cluster

2004-07-05 Thread techs
Hello! We've been wrestling with a resource utilization problem on our cluster of 6 vpopmail servers. What we're seeing is that our network and RAID 5 IDE-based disk array on our central mail store server is not able to keep up with the 'client' servers doing the POP3, IMAP, Webmail, and SMTP leg

[vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread techs
Hello! Currently on our Qmail server cluster (3 servers scanning SMTP traffic in and out) we're checking: relays.ordb.org bl.spamcop.net dnsbl.njabl.org opm.blitzed.org sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org blackholes.mail-abuse.org via rblsmtpd. So far, we've noticed that Spamcop and Spamhaus are the two most e