On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 13:45, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> At 01:12 PM 2/27/2004, Rob G wrote:
> >This error with over 2MB files is a MUA problem and not a problem with the
> >mail server. There really is no way to correc this then telling the
> >customer to use a File Transfering protocol as in FT
At 01:12 PM 2/27/2004, Rob G wrote:
This error with over 2MB files is a MUA problem and not a problem with the
mail server. There really is no way to correc this then telling the
customer to use a File Transfering protocol as in FTP or something of the
sorts to transfer Large Files instead of emai
Thank you!
I was going crazy looking for the fix for this issue. What we have been
telling our customers is to use WebMail (squirrel) and delete the
offending file after they looked at it.
Thanks again
AMR
Troy E Bouchard
mtida.net
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 13:12, Rob G wrote:
> This error with o
This error with over 2MB files is a MUA problem and not a problem with the
mail server. There really is no way to correc this then telling the
customer to use a File Transfering protocol as in FTP or something of the
sorts to transfer Large Files instead of email which I have found that is
not a r
I am experiencing delays in recieving large emails ... I can't find any
reference in the docs on how to increase the delay in receiving emails.
Can anyone explain to me how to do this?
Typically when a file that is 2MB or larger the pop3 service kind of
chokes out and the user gets a time out err
28000 mails in the queue and you're using the chkuser patch? My guess is
that over 27000 of those are spam double-bounces waiting to be delivered. I
might suggest setting up another machine to be a smart smtp host to handle
outgoing mail. Trying to resend all that mail takes non-trivial resources.
Hi Jeremy:
Thanks for replying.
We're using spamc in a maildrop filter called for each pop account (via
qmailadmin's spam enable setting). User SA prefs are maintained by. MySQL
Good suggestion on the catch-alls - we'll do a scan for accounts with many
emails. We do have some with 10 to 15,000
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 12:53, Jeff Koch wrote:
> Does anybody have any suggestion for improving the performance of a
> mailserver runnning qmail/vpopmail/qmailadmin/qmail-scanner/spamassassin?
are you using spamd and having qmail-scanner call spamc? or is it
calling spamassassin. if the latter,
Does anybody have any suggestion for improving the performance of a
mailserver runnning qmail/vpopmail/qmailadmin/qmail-scanner/spamassassin?
We're using a 2.4Ghz P4 with 1GB RAM and a 40GB SCSI drive. The operating
system is a basic RH8.0 install with the ext3 journalling file system.
We're ha
* Jared Seipel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-27 18:46]:
> Anyway, this did the trick, beside the fact that the CRAM-MD5
> authenticates against the clear text password and the particular client
> that is asking for this has requested clear passwords disabled. Oh Well.
This is a technical problem.
Sorry about the redundant post, but I just subscribed to the list and I
couldn't reach the archives. I didn't even think to read the UPGRADE doc
or look in the contrib.
Anyway, this did the trick, beside the fact that the CRAM-MD5
authenticates against the clear text password and the particular c
* Jared Seipel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-27 17:35]:
> I'm having a strange issue with getting vchkpw to accept cram-md5
> authentications via SMTP and I was wondering if anyone knows where I'm
> going wrong or if anyone has a similar issue.
> I'm running vpopmail 5.4.0 and qmail patched with q
I'm having a strange issue with getting vchkpw to accept cram-md5
authentications via SMTP and I was wondering if anyone knows where I'm
going wrong or if anyone has a similar issue.
I'm running vpopmail 5.4.0 and qmail patched with qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31.
Login and Plain auths are working fine, b
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:57:37AM -0300, Juliano Primavesi - CyberWeb Networks wrote:
>>> Your other option is to run the mysql patch for tcpserver. This lets
>>> tcpserver lookup the relay table instead of using the cdb. Far more
>>> efficient in my finding so far.
> Where can I find thi
Where can I find this patch?
Juliano
Neil Spierling wrote:
>
> Is there any special way of configure'ing vpopmail when tcpserver has
> the patch applied n installed (ie --enable-tcpserver-file etc flags)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shane Chrisp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Frida
I tried to use my server
[rooot]#mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subject: gggh
fff
^D
its the same it says "SYSERR(vpopmail): savemail: cannot save rejected email
anywhere:"
Jeremy Kitchen writes:
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 00:58, Axel o. Yson wrote:
why I cant send mail when I modify my /usr/local/vp
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 00:58, Axel o. Yson wrote:
> why I cant send mail when I modify my /usr/local/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp
>
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-
> queue.pl"
> 198.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-
> queue.
17 matches
Mail list logo
