vchkpw eats 99% of cpu time

Friday February 02 2001 15:08, Dan Phoenix wrote to Cajus Pollmeier: DP> I have seen this before when dns was setup wrong. DP> ie host not resolving. Certainly worth a try. I changed resolv.conf to point to another server. KS

Re: vchkpw eats 99% of cpu time

not sure what the problem would be without personally logging in... but i would write maybe a nice wrapper for it for now...man nice. On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Kari Suomela wrote: > Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 17:46:42 -0500 > From: Kari Suomela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: vc

Re: vchkpw eats 99% of cpu time

I have seen this before when dns was setup wrong. ie host not resolving. On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:49:00 +0100 > From: Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: vchkpw eats 99% of cpu time > > H

vchkpw eats 99% of cpu time

Friday February 02 2001 20:49, Cajus Pollmeier wrote to All: CP> In 90% of all cases popping the mails works fine. The other 10% CP> create CP> a vchkpw process consuming 99% cpu time, staying there till I send CP> a This happens consistently after a failed login attempt. This is pretty se

Re: Next 5.0 features

I'd recommend going one further and allowing and "admin" admin tool that can be further protected by the webserver and executed to administer what the postmaster can do (such as limits on each domain). Brian > How about being able to add virtual domains through the mail admin tool?? > >

Re: Next 5.0 features

> I would be interested to hear real world experiences from folks > who are running vpopmail(etc). Perhaps we can figure out what > needs to be changed to make it a better package. I agree that it is a wonderful package, and the only possible improvements I can think of are some general code tidy

Re: Next 5.0 features

How about being able to add virtual domains through the mail admin tool?? Also, include documentation on upgrading to the newer versions.. Thanks >From: Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Next 5.0 features >Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 22:26:51 -0600 > > >We are looking a

vchkpw eats 99% of cpu time

Hi all! I've got a little [well it grows ;-)] problem with vchkpw. Thats my setup: qmail 1.03 + qmailqueue-patch scan4virus 0.94 vpopmail 4.9.8 ucspi-tcp 0.88 daemontools 0.70 Starting with svscan with something like this in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3/run: #!/bin/sh HOSTNAME=`hostname -f

Re: Next 5.0 features

I've attached the limits.c file. It should be more robust and "create" the table if its not there. Brian > > Hi Brian > > > I've updated my copy of qmailadmin that loads > > the limits from mysql already, if interested... > Yes, I'm, can you send me the source ? > > > > - I

Re: Next 5.0 features

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ken, Friday, February 02, 2001, 5:26:51 AM, you wrote: > I would be interested to hear real world experiences from folks > who are running vpopmail(etc). Perhaps we can figure out what > needs to be changed to make it a better package. I'd really like t

RE: Next 5.0 features

I would love good maildrop support for vpopmail users, including the ability to edit the filters from sqwebmail for those users. Current releases do not support this except for /etc/passwd users. -Original Message- From: kbo [mailto:kbo]On Behalf Of Ken Jones Sent: Thursday, February 01,

RE: Next 5.0 features

When this version in final version is available ? march 2001 ? Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED] France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751 USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A -Original Message- From: Russell "Elik" Rademac

Next 5.0 features

Beside having a help menu in the Qmailadmin, it is also nice if there is reworked autoresponder system, which is more of vacation, since lot of people think that you have to have two same email accounts to setup the autoresponder, which I have to teach them again and again how to do it pro

Re: Next 5.0 features

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:26:51PM -0600, Ken Jones wrote: > 3. Code review for efficency > > These are the things that are important to me. If anyone here ... 0. Code review for stability. Always check ALL return values to avoid incomplete creations. Make vpopmail.pm understand when to use user

Re: Next 5.0 features

I've updated my copy of qmailadmin that loads the limits from mysql already, if interested... Thanks, Brian > > I recommend updating the "load_limits()" function of qmailadmin > > to load/maintain the "limits" from a mysql table rather than > > a file. Also, an interface to maintain thi

Re: Next 5.0 features

> I recommend updating the "load_limits()" function of qmailadmin > to load/maintain the "limits" from a mysql table rather than > a file. Also, an interface to maintain this table would > be nice. I think the same > While in the limits, maybe add a domain quota to > the limits table too... I'

Re: Next 5.0 features

How about online documentation on how to use qmailadmin for end-users? The current way for people to learn is trial & error. > > We are looking at the features to add to the vpopmail 5.0 release. > > Here are the current major changes we are thinking about > > 1. vqmail-local sup

vqsignup login

Hi I've setup qmail,sqwebmail,vqsignup etc... How can I stop certain domain name to log in by the web into their account? Thanks

Re: Next 5.0 features

How about a detail HOWTO to setup VPOPMAIL, QMAILADMIN, COURIER-IMAP and SQWEBMAIL. Will help a lot of people. Regards Sumith - Original Message - From: Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 9:56 AM Subject: Next 5.0 features > > We are l