Just some followup...
On Tuesday 30 August 2011, Christoph Schwarz wrote:
> On 30/08/2011 3:50 AM, WAROQUIERS Philippe wrote:
> >> However, the cost seems to include overhead from valgrind itself, such
> >> as malloc& other hooks.
...
> > Are you sure these hooks are from valgrind ?
...
> Probabl
On 30/08/2011 3:50 AM, WAROQUIERS Philippe wrote:
>> However, the cost seems to include overhead from valgrind itself, such
>> as malloc& other hooks.
>> (I see in the call graph that malloc calls "malloc_hook_ini"
>> once with a
>> cost of around 60,000 Ir.
>> Having only one a few mallocs in a p
>However, the cost seems to include overhead from valgrind itself, such
>as malloc & other hooks.
>(I see in the call graph that malloc calls "malloc_hook_ini"
>once with a
>cost of around 60,000 Ir.
>Having only one a few mallocs in a particluar algorithm this overhead
>greatly distorts test r
