We have code that implements v8_inspector::V8InspectorClient and when we
upgraded to V8 13.1.36 (thought he problem looks like it's there up to
13.1.99) we get the following when we try to link:
ld64.lld: error: undefined symbol: typeinfo for
v8_inspector::V8InspectorClient
>>> referenced by /U
but this is a bit of a hassle for us, currently.
Thanks
On Thursday, September 26, 2024 at 12:25:53 PM UTC-4 alex...@gmail.com
wrote:
> We have code that implements v8_inspector::V8InspectorClient and when we
> upgraded to V8 13.1.36 (thought he problem looks like it's there up t
t; On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:42 AM Jakob Kummerow
> wrote:
>
>> +Benedikt Meurer who made these changes and might have an opinion.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 12:55 PM alex...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW, I rebuilt V8 after I made th
To flesh out Ben's answer a bit, you'd want a Persistent reference to obj
which you could SetWeak. I guess maybe that's obvious but never hurts to
state the obvious. The Persistent reference could be inside Point or a base
class of Point (and others) if you have a menagerie of object types to
m
I think it means that JavaScript code should not be called and maybe even
messing with data in the heap is a bad idea. Not sure about the latter. I
think the heap and JS stack are in indeterminate or at least intermediate
states that wouldn't tolerate interlopers when you enter the callback so
ponent
> "Chromium > Blink > JavaScript > Runtime" and assign it to me.
>
> Thanks,
> - Victor
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 6:14 AM alex...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I have a class with many private functions/properties
Hey folks,
I have a class with many private functions/properties (77 in the most
recent incarnation). When I get a stack trace (say to create an Error
object) when I'm inside a function in this class, we end up in
ClassScope::ClassScope in scopes.cc:
```
if (scope_info->HasSavedClassVariable(
ocal names
hash table. But this is just kibitzing.
On Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 12:14:53 AM UTC-4 alex...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have a class with many private functions/properties (77 in the most
> recent incarnation). When I get a stack trace (say to create an Err
from the ScopeInfo. Care to file
> a bug?
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:32 PM alex...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, one "thought" I had on this was that if saved_class_variable_info
>> were an Smi if the local names are inlined and a String reference, if no
