especially from PoV of LAPI?
Cheers,
Yuki Shiino
2018年8月31日金曜日 0時50分55秒 UTC+9 Sathya Gunasekaran:
>
> LGTM
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 8:23 AM Adam Klein wrote:
>
>> This LGTM, based on the stage at TC39.
>>
>> It'd be nice if we knew more about other browse
I see. If Domenic is okay, I'm okay, too.
LGTM.
2018年9月7日(金) 5:38 Domenic Denicola :
> From: Yuki Shiino
>
> > +cc: domenic@, what do you think of this, especially from PoV of LAPI?
>
> This won't be useful for LAPIs, but that's OK. We need a bigger solu
s.
b2) Make a new API like v8::TryCatch::PendingException() and make it return
a thrown exception or pending exception in the isolate if any. Blink
rewrites all Exception() to the new one.
What do you think of the issue and proposals?
Cheers,
Yuki Shiino
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v
SomethingElseWithV8 due to a pending termination exception.
Cheers,
Yuki Shiino
2018年11月8日(木) 3:18 Kentaro Hara :
> Sorry, I'm not sure if I understand your example...
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 2:21 AM Yutaka Hirano wrote:
>
>> +ricea@
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 7,
s a thrown exception if an
exception is thrown inside the TryCatch scope or the termination exception
if the isolate is terminating.
Cheers,
Yuki Shiino
2018年11月8日(木) 17:38 Kentaro Hara :
> Thanks, I got it :)
>
> My proposal would be:
>
> (a3) Make HasCaught() return true when the
>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-intuitive,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and it might be better to have Isolate::IsExecutionTerminating
>>>>>>>>>>>> return true,
>>>>>>>>&g
tests? or Blink tests
(web tests / layout tests)? or other embedder's tests?
If they're not Blink tests, can we introduce a new API like
Isolate::TerminateExecutionAndKeepExecutionTerminated?
2018年11月22日(木) 18:36 Yuki Shiino :
> What you could do is add a check after E1 for
>
+cc: v8-users@googlegroups.com
2015-06-04 11:12 GMT+09:00 Yuki Shiino :
> +cc: v8-users@googlegroups.com
> -cc: v8-team
>
> Sorry, changed the mailing list to v8-users.
>
> Cheers,
> Yuki Shiino
>
>
> 2015-06-03 22:20 GMT+09:00 Yuki Shiino :
>
>> Hi V8 te
e appropriate
holder.
Cheers,
Yuki Shiino
2015-06-04 16:56 GMT+09:00 Ben L. Titzer :
> Is it possible to emulate these semantics with a wrapper function that
> catches type errors at the API boundary?
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:12 AM, Yuki Shiino
> wrote:
>
>> +cc:
Okay, let us go with the CL. Thanks for the reply.
Cheers,
Yuki Shiino
2015-06-05 17:36 GMT+09:00 Jochen Eisinger :
> The CL you wrote is the way to go. The bindings also have to type check
> all incoming arguments, so I don't see that there's a special new security
> risk
Resending to v8-users@.
2015-09-09 17:31 GMT+09:00 Yuki Shiino :
> I'm sorry that I misunderstood your question. Maybe I'm still
> misunderstanding... Please correct me if any.
>
> There are (at least) two modes in the named property interceptor, masking
> and non-ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
