On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Anoop R. S. wrote:
> Thank you for the reply, Ben.
>>
>> Instead of v8::IndexedPropertyHandlerConfiguration, you may
>> want to use v8::NamedPropertyHandlerConfiguration.
>
> I am already using it. What I noticed is that, when I run the code without
> devtools deb
Thank you for the reply, Ben.
> Instead of v8::IndexedPropertyHandlerConfiguration, you may
> want to use v8::NamedPropertyHandlerConfiguration.
>
I am already using it.
What I noticed is that, when I run the code without devtools debugging,
only the callback *GenericNamedPropertyGetterCallba
Thank you for the reply, Ben.
> Instead of v8::IndexedPropertyHandlerConfiguration, you may
> want to use v8::NamedPropertyHandlerConfiguration.
>
I am already using it. What I noticed is that, when I run the code without
devtools debugging, only the callback *GenericNamedPropertyGetterCallbac
Thank you for the reply, Ben.
> Instead of v8::IndexedPropertyHandlerConfiguration, you may
> want to use v8::NamedPropertyHandlerConfiguration.
>
I am already using it. What I noticed is that, when I run the code without
devtools debugging, only the callback *GenericNamedPropertyGetterCallbac
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Anoop R. S. wrote:
> Ok. I figured out that if v8::IndexedPropertyHandlerConfiguration is set,
> and IndexedPropertyEnumeratorCallback is implemented, I can configure what
> is displayed on mouse over action (Debugger.evaluateOnCallFrame is passed
> from devtools
