thanks, I'm struggling between function() { return ( "expression" ) } and
running a script like: with(myContextProxy){ "expression" }. The latter
allows me to handle this.x and x resolution separately as well but has
other drawbacks (this is still not the object I want it to be so I cant put
it
Sorry I did reflect that there's probably cases of simpler expessions.
You could limit it to just no semicolons, and only allow commas, then you
could just put it in a `()=>(/*expression without return*/)`
but that doesn't let you pass a this.
so you could make a `function() { return ` + (your ex
I run scripts to extend a 'this', but when that script runs, it just
iniializes this.whatever and provides methods like this.handleMessage =
function() {}
If I want the object initilaized with the script to give me a value, I'd
call a method on the this, but I don't know that the initialization co
Thank you!
Also, In the case I'm running a Script (and not a function), if I write
"myvariable" or "this.myvariable" then is there a way to distuingish
between the two in the C++ side? Currently how I'm using it is like this:
The context the script runs in has a global object with my template,
No, that method would still require a return statement. Getting rid of the
return statement requirement would need a new API, or transforming the source
program before using it.
> On Jun 21, 2019, at 3:27 AM, Zoltan B wrote:
>
> Thanks for your answer! :)
>
> In the (1) solution of yours, is
Thanks for your answer! :)
In the (1) solution of yours, is there a way to be able to create functions
that behave like scripts? I mean, that if I write onclick="1+1", then if I
parse and run "1+1" as a function it would return 2 without using the
"return" keyword (e.g.: "return 1+1")?
2019. j
I don’t believe you can do exactly what you want here, as there are two parts:
1) getting `this` set properly. I believe you should be able to use
`CompileFunctionInContext()` to this effect, which is used to provide implicit
arguments to DOM onxxx=“script...” handlers. I believe you can then ma
Any ideas? :)
2019. június 7., péntek 13:16:08 UTC+2 időpontban Zoltan B a következőt
írta:
>
> Hi!
>
> Is there a way to provide value for the 'this' keyword, when I'm running a
> v8 Script?
>
> An alternative would be to compile the code as a function instead, and
> provide 'this' when calli
