Victor, thanks for the quick response. I had
created https://issues.chromium.org/issues/409512701 though I don't see how
I can assign it to your or anyone else. Maybe I can't?
As far as a repro goes, I can easily reproduce with my executable but my
company would not want me to send it to you :-
Hello!
Could you please file a bug report about this issue:
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/new
Thank you!
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 6:15 AM alex...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have a class with many private functions/properties (77 in the most
> recent incarnation). When I get a stack
Please assign it to victorgo...@chromium.org
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:29 AM Victor Gomes wrote:
> Thanks for the email, alexkodat.
>
> It seems to be a bug when rehashing the table after code cache. Do you
> have a repro?
> Could you please file a bug in https://issues.chromium.org component
>
Thanks for the email, alexkodat.
It seems to be a bug when rehashing the table after code cache. Do you have
a repro?
Could you please file a bug in https://issues.chromium.org component
"Chromium > Blink > JavaScript > Runtime" and assign it to me.
Thanks,
- Victor
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 6:14 A
FWIW, one "thought" I had on this was that if saved_class_variable_info
were an Smi if the local names are inlined and a String reference, if not,
then there would never be a need to fix anything up during deserialization
as the String reference could be used to do a lookup in the local names
h
