Just a very quick note to say thank you for the OpsDir review; it's much
appreciated.
W
On Fri, Dec 16 2022 at 6:09 AM, Qin Wu wrote:
> Reviewer: Qin Wu
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF doc
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 16, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>
>> I throw away the one that contains 'bar', fair enough, got it. What I don't
>> understand is what a record would look like w
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Binu Ramakrishnan wrote:
> Confirmed, and updated the doc with the RFC reference.
>
Awesome, thanks!
W
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 16, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Warre
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
way scares me...
W
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:47 PM Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On May 10, 2018, at 10:41 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> >
>> > [ Edit: Could the format of the _mta-sts to be something like:
>> > "_mta-sts.e
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:36 AM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
>
> > On May 10, 2018, at 11:23 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> >
> >> An attacker who can inject false DNS resolutions can, of course,
> redirect either the fixed mta-sts host or insert a spoofed TXT
> respo
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:07 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> > On May 10, 2018, at 5:39 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> >
> > The good news is that I don't think there is a practical difference for
> those that want to deploy this; they still do the same thing. The bad news
> is that Warren's concern abo
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:16 AM Daniel Margolis
wrote:
> I also want to point out (in regards to Warren's comment) that someone who
> controls mta-sts.example.com *and can inject the _mta-sts TXT record* can
> only redirect mail insofar as they could do so otherwise--because they will
> still nee
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:30 PM Daniel Margolis
wrote:
> Put slightly differently, allowing TXT-based indirection can at best be
as secure as the current design, and at worse introduce some unknown
vulnerability (depending on DNS architecture for a zone, etc). So I think
that's really the main re
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-19: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-05: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
13 matches
Mail list logo
