Re: [Uta] [Iotops] BRSKI and IDevID (non-!)issues with draft-ietf-uta-use-san

2021-05-15 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
For what it's worth, On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 1:52 PM Michael Richardson wrote: > > Salz, Rich wrote: > > That is great to hear, thanks for the careful analysis. > > >> Some nits: > > > All look like good things to do, I'll make a PR soonish. > > > What do you think of just rewri

Re: [Uta] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-uta-xmpp-06: (with COMMENT)

2015-04-20 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Peter, On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote: > Hi Spencer, thanks for the review. Comments inline. > > > On 4/20/15 2:23 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > >> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-uta-xmpp-06: Yes >> >> When respondi

Re: [Uta] draft-ietf-uta-xmpp downref

2015-04-21 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Barry, On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > I had looked at that, but missed it, because there were two last > calls. The first (which I looked at) did not include the downrefs. > The second, the following day, did -- it was a revised last call to > add the downrefs. > > So

Re: [Uta] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-02-27 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Not my ballot thread, but "TLS Required: no" is a LOT clearer to me. I'm not the target audience, but the original order screws me up every time I see it in a ballot e-mail. Do the right thing, of course. Spencer On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:11 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 0