Hi,
Like Sean, I'm on board with this. I also support adoption and will work
with the WG to revise the I-D in a timely manner based on input received.
Thanks,
Chris
On 4/22/22 8:59 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Hi,
recent discussion on the ML showed some interest of the WG in adoption
of draft-cip
the Cipher Suites in Secure Syslog
Authors : Chris Lonvick
Sean Turner
Joe Salowey
Filename: draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-02.txt
Pages : 8
Date: 2022-09-11
Abstract:
The Syslog Wor
IETF.
Title : Updates to the Cipher Suites in Secure Syslog
Authors : Chris Lonvick
Sean Turner
Joe Salowey
Filename: draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-04.txt
Pages : 8
Date: 2023-08-15
Abs
Hi,
We think that this version is ready for WG Last Call. Would the members of
the WG please review and let us know (on the WG list) if there are any
objections?
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog
evices to offer that algorithm --and allow log
messages to continue to be delivered during a transition.
We're still looking for more reviews and discussion on this topic.
Best regards,
Chris
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 11:42 AM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 07:16:01AM -0400, C
2023 at 12:53:39PM -0400, Chris Lonvick wrote:
> > Hi Viktor and all,
> >
> > I see your point.
> >
> > How about if the phrases "MUST NOT offer TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA" in
> > Sections 4 and 5 be changed to "SHOULD NOT offer..."?
> &g
in the
> environment
> that the administrator is configuring, they'll ignore any guidance anyway.
>
> On Wednesday, 6 September 2023 22:14:54 CEST, Chris Lonvick wrote:
> > Hi Ilari,
> >
> > If a syslog server MUST NOT offer the only cipher suite that an
> > as
that syslog messages may continue
to be delivered until the device is updated to have a secure cipher
suite.
---^^^---
Please comment and suggest any further edits for WG review.
Best regards,
Chris
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 9:26 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 12:53:39P
Hi Viktor,
That works for me. I'll wait for the Chairs to ask for a new version before
publishing.
Best regards,
Chris
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 12:39 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 07:25:51AM -0400, Chris Lonvick wrote:
>
> > I think that the changes to
Hi Paul,
We (authors) discussed and agree with the migration plan. The ID has been
changed to reflect that.
The reason for drafting the ID and making the recommendation was to ensure
interoperability. We were approached by members of an IEC working group who
were going to use TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_A
10 matches
Mail list logo
