Using HSTS in Conjunction with Self-Signed Public-Key Certificates
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6797#section-11.3
11.3. Using HSTS in Conjunction with Self-Signed Public-Key
Certificates
If all four of the following conditions are true...
o a web site/organization/enterprise is gen
following supplemental rules:
[...various supplemental rules to add to those defined in RFC6125.. ]
..thus I am curious as to why draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs does not
officially update RFC6125 -- should it not (in addition to updating four
other RFCs as it notes) ?
thanks, HT
Hi Alexey,
>On 02/02/2016 00:54, =JeffH wrote:
>>
>>
>> I was taking a look at wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs and noted that
>> it says this in Section 3..
>>
>>[...]
>>Matching is performed according
need to
> normatively reference what they profile, but not the other way 'round.
OK, I can live with that. Thanks for the clarification,
=JeffH
___
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
s://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-margolis-smtp-sts
(which has now morphed in to two separate I-Ds)
..and possibly also..
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-uta-email-deep
..yes?
thx, hth,
=JeffH
___
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
