I’ve been following the thread (mainly Geoff and EKR), and I think I have it
narrowed down to the following.
* Now the assertion in the draft that: "Cryptographically-relevant quantum
computers, once available, will have a huge impact on TLS traffic." is true,
for what its worth, but its r
Thanks Rich - this would address my review comments
Geoff
> On 27 Feb 2025, at 2:05 am, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> I’ve been following the thread (mainly Geoff and EKR), and I think I have it
> narrowed down to the following.
>
> Now the assertion in the draft that: "Cryptographically-relevant
Thanks Rich - this would address my review comments
Thanks for the review and conversation thread. I’ll post a new version and
have the WG take a look.
___
Uta mailing list -- uta@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to uta-le...@ietf.org
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-06.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Using TLS in Applications (UTA) WG of the IETF.
Title: New Protocols Must Require TLS 1.3
Authors: Rich Salz
Nimrod Aviram
Name:draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-06.txt
Pages: 8
This version removes the duplication in Section 1 (as it's in Section 6). It
also revises some of the wording in Section 3 to make clear it is not a
detailed threat analysis. These were done in response to Geoff's DNSDIR review.
The "diff url" is helpful. Please post if you disagree with the ch
