Hi Rich,
before starting a WGLC I have one comment.
The last version of the draft states that the document updates RFC 9325.
However, it is not specified in the draft which part of RFC 9325 is being
updated and in what way.
I believe the draft should explicitly say what is changed comparing to RF
> The last version of the draft states that the document updates RFC 9325.
> However, it is not specified in the draft which part of RFC 9325 is being
> updated and in what way.
> I believe the draft should explicitly say what is changed comparing to RFC
> 9325.
> Also please add a statement to
> Thanks, those are quite reasonable things to ask. :)
>
> I think this should be part of BCP 195, so I changed this from
> standards-track to
> BCP.
> I also moved the QUICTLS and DNSTLS from normative to informative references.
>
> Does this diff address your first point?
Yes, thanks.
Regard
>> Does this diff address your first point?
>Yes, thanks.
Great, I will submit a new version
___
Uta mailing list -- uta@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to uta-le...@ietf.org
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-02.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Using TLS in Applications (UTA) WG of the IETF.
Title: New Protocols Must Require TLS 1.3
Authors: Rich Salz
Nimrod Aviram
Name:draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-02.txt
Pages: 8
