[Uta] FW: Proposal for Consolidating Parts of the ART & TSV Areas

Hi all, Forwarding an IESG proposal about area merging to ART working groups (those most affected), in case you haven’t already seen it. If you have any comments, please send them to the IESG i...@ietf.org (or to me if you prefer for me to relay them) no later than 20 Sep

Re: [Uta] Reviews requested - draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog

Hi Viktor, Your comments didn't go unnoticed. I think that the changes to Sections 4 and 5 should be limited to replacing "MUST NOT" with "SHOULD NOT". That will provide clear guidance for implementers. I was then thinking of changing the Security Considerations section to the following: ---vvv-

Re: [Uta] Reviews requested - draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 07:25:51AM -0400, Chris Lonvick wrote: > I think that the changes to Sections 4 and 5 should be limited to > replacing "MUST NOT" with "SHOULD NOT". That will provide clear > guidance for implementers. > > I was then thinking of changing the Security Considerations section