Hi John,
Thanks for taking the time to provide feedback and my apologies for the
delayed reply. Comments inline.
On 12/27/22 8:21 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
Valery,
Thanks. In skimming back through this, I noticed several typos
and evidence of editorial carelessness. The ones that might be
> Thanks for taking the time to provide feedback and my apologies for the
delayed reply. Comments inline.
Ditto what Peter said. I'll try to read more during this week (sigh, Nomcom),
but just on one issue:
>> (2) The document makes several references to URIs, but only RFC
>> 3986 appears to
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 03:31:37PM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> From: John C Klensin [mailto:john-i...@jck.com]
>
> (2) The document makes several references to URIs, but only RFC
> 3986 appears to be referenced. In the real world in which
> certificates are established and used and in which d
