Would like to see if there’s any other thoughts?
spt
> On Sep 12, 2022, at 00:24, Chris Lonvick wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We've submitted an update to this ID for review by the Working Group.
>
> Thanks to our reviewers and their suggestions. We've incorporated most of
> their recommended changes.
> Would like to see if there’s any other thoughts?
When I wrote about
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/LlJ1Pv_7ZC3ziRPOApCE9f2W7N4/ I forgot
that 1.0 and 1.1 were already deprecated in an RFC. I think 1.2 is okay, but
perhaps add a sentence or two in security considerations saying "
