Re: [Uta] 6125bis -- security considerations

2021-10-01 Thread Salz, Rich
Thanks for your feedback, Ryan and Alexey. I basically did what you suggested. I share your concerns about the public suffix list. Does the WG have any thoughts? FYI, Ryan wrote this: * I'm a little sad any time there is a new dependency on the public suffix list, even informative :) I

Re: [Uta] 6125bis -- security considerations

2021-10-01 Thread Ryan Sleevi
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:07 AM Salz, Rich wrote: > I still would like comments on the last paragraph of the section: > > > >- To accommodate the workaround that was needed before the development >of the SNI extension, this specification allows multiple DNS-IDs, SRV-IDs, >or URI-IDs i