I am in favor of adoption and am willing to review.
I note that this requires CCM8. ISTM that the analysis of this we just
landed in DTLS should call this into question.
-Ekr
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:54 AM Valery Smyslov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during the last virtual interim meeting the
> draft-
Am 19.05.20 um 10:10 schrieb Ivan Ristic:
> I've been hearing anecdotal evidence that email providers don't accept small
> values for the maximum policy age in MTA-STS, for example anything smaller
> than a day. I searched around and I found a few articles saying things to
> that effect, but
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 09:07:06PM +0200, A. Schulze wrote:
> I asked a similar question last year:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/bnUjy9jxM_Va-lDXVtbB32zIkYI/
> Currently I use ~ 3 days as "max-age" and receive reports from google
> that don't let me think they have any problem with
