Reviewer: Yaron Sheffer
Review result: Has Nits
[Apologies for the late review.]
* Intro: To avoid confusion, please mention the header parameter "No" to
clarify why the header is named RequireTLS when its semantics is the exact
opposite, "prioritize delivery over ability to negotiate TLS"? The s
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:43:34AM -0800, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> I would have expected a parameter to be associated with REQUIRETLS to indicate
> whether DANE is required throughout the forwarding path, or MTA-STS, or either
> one will do.
Leaving the security mechanism unspecified was a delibera
