> On Oct 20, 2017, at 7:09 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
>
> Maybe this was explained somewhere earlier in the thread and I missed it, but
> can you explain what ‘vanity hosts’ are?
An alternate name for an MX host that might require a non-default
certificate chain based on SNI. For example, a custo
> On Oct 21, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 7:09 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
>>
>> Maybe this was explained somewhere earlier in the thread and I missed it,
>> but can you explain what ‘vanity hosts’ are?
>
> An alternate name for an MX host that might requ
> On Oct 21, 2017, at 7:22 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
>
> One situation I can think of that might still require SNI is if two providers
> merged and combined their infrastructure. Example.com and example.net might
> each have 1000s of customers and it might not be practical for them to get
> the
