Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08

2022-12-19 Thread Qin Wu
: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis@ietf.org; uta@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08 On Tue, Dec 20, 2022, at 14:00, Qin Wu wrote: > If we can introduce long prefix match like mechanism to deal with > multiple level of subdomain matching, this issue will be

Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08

2022-12-19 Thread Martin Thomson
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022, at 14:00, Qin Wu wrote: > If we can introduce long prefix match like mechanism to deal with > multiple level of subdomain matching, this issue will be easily solved. This is not something that the IETF can do at this stage - or at least not so simply. Wildcard certificates

Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08

2022-12-19 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Peter: I think the root cause of this wildcard certificate issue you described below is Wildcard only covers one level of subdomains, instead of multiple level of subdomains, If we can introduce long prefix match like mechanism to deal with multiple level of subdomain matching, this issue w

Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08

2022-12-19 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 12/19/22 11:18 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 12/19/22 12:33 AM, Qin Wu wrote: 7.Section 7.1 I am surprised there is no protection measures to mitigate risk of vouching for rogue or buggy hosts in this document? It seems to me that methods for mitigating the attacks described in [Defeatin

Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08

2022-12-19 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 12/19/22 12:33 AM, Qin Wu wrote: 7.Section 7.1 I am surprised there is no protection measures to mitigate risk of vouching for rogue or buggy hosts in this document? It seems to me that methods for mitigating the attacks described in [Defeating-SSL] and [HTTPSbytes] are probably out of scop

Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08

2022-12-18 Thread Qin Wu
>> 7.Section 7.1 >> I am surprised there is no protection measures to mitigate risk of >> vouching for rogue or buggy hosts in this document? > > It seems to me that methods for mitigating the attacks described in > [Defeating-SSL] and [HTTPSbytes] are probably out of scope for this document. >

Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08

2022-12-18 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 12/17/22 6:40 AM, Qin Wu wrote: Hi, Peter: -邮件原件- 发件人: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im] 发送时间: 2022年12月17日 6:51 收件人: Qin Wu ; ops-...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis@ietf.org; uta@ietf.org 主题: Re: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08 Hello and tha

Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08

2022-12-17 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Peter: -邮件原件- 发件人: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im] 发送时间: 2022年12月17日 6:51 收件人: Qin Wu ; ops-...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis@ietf.org; uta@ietf.org 主题: Re: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08 Hello and thanks for the early review. I've prov

Re: [Uta] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08

2022-12-16 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Hello and thanks for the early review. I've provided a few comments inline. On 12/16/22 4:09 AM, Qin Wu via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Qin Wu Review result: Has Nits I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being proce