Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[...]
This shipped during the course of the discussion:
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5105856067141632
Chrome 110 shipped Feb 7 2023. I do not think it's a victory to have a
document take so long.
The emoji domains aren't going away. There's no argument there, as far a
> Thanks! Yes, if the issue is to be settled, rfc6125bis is not the best
battle ground.
Nicely put, thanks.
___
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 04:34:15PM -0700, Rob Sayre wrote:
> I think I will not raise any objection to draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis. I
> might write a different draft that says "all of the IETF IDNA documents are
> misleading, the internet runs on UTS-46", but that is not specific to this
> draft.
T
