All I was requesting was that the URL be turned into a reference. It looks
like there is a solid enough reference in Rob's mail for an Informative
reference, which is all this needs.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023, at 07:35, Rob Sayre wrote:
> I think it should be in informative references. I cited it inl
I think it should be in informative references. I cited it inline just for
clarity in mailing list communications.
We rely on ICANN for "Assigned Names and Numbers", so I think it is
perfectly fine to cite their board resolution here (either URL works for
me).
There are no RFC2119 words in this s
Yes, as the document shepherd this raises questions for me on "normative" /
"informative" etc...
I welcome any guidance on if this will be acceptable in its current state.
OS
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 2:12 PM Rob Sayre wrote:
> Martin wrote that he thought the ICANN citation needed to be more
> c
