Hi,
I'm going to close the WGLC this week anyway. But it will be great if we receive
few more reviews before this, especially from those people, who wanted to
include
IP-ID into the document.
Regards,
Valery.
> Hi,
>
> this is a reminder, that the WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08 is stil
Hi,
this is a reminder, that the WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08 is still
open.
We think the draft would benefit from a few more reviews.
Please consider reviewing the draft and sending your opinion about
its readiness for publication (even if it is just "the draft is ready, ship
it").
Re
Hi,
as you may have noticed, the WGLC is still open. We'd like to receive
few more responses regarding the readiness of the draft, so we
will wait for a week or two (to let folks return from IETF 115
and have some rest before coming back to work).
Please consider reviewing the draft and sending y
On 10/28/22 1:54 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
Two things I wasn't sure about and left out:
* A seemingly incomplete sentence in §6.4:
"For an IP address that appears in a URI-ID, the "host" component of
both the reference identity and the presented identifier."
Should it rather be:
"For an
Two things I wasn't sure about and left out:
* A seemingly incomplete sentence in §6.4:
"For an IP address that appears in a URI-ID, the "host" component of
both the reference identity and the presented identifier."
Should it rather be:
"For an IP address that appears in a URI-ID, the "host
Hi all,
On 28/10/2022, 13:20, "Uta" wrote:
> this is just a friendly reminder, that the WGLC is in progress and
> will end soon.
> So far we received only one message from one of the authors.
> Please, find a moment to review the draft and drop a message to the
> list about its readiness for furt
Hi,
this is just a friendly reminder, that the WGLC is in progress and will end
soon.
So far we received only one message from one of the authors.
Please, find a moment to review the draft and drop a message to the list
about its readiness for further progress.
Regards,
Leif & Valery.
> Hi,
>
As co-author I am biased, but I believe that Martin and Peter did a fine job of
incorporating IP-ID into the document, and I believe it's ready to advance.
___
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
Hi,
this message starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-08
(Service Identity in TLS):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/
This is the second WGLC for this draft: the draft's scope
has been widened, so now it includes IP-ID too. To accommodate IP-ID
