Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-04

I am reading this now. It’s good, I like it. One nit; should Section 4.2 be titled “Cipher Suites for TLS 1.2” ? In section 6.4, the “(e.g., even more than a few hours)” should probably replace it with “(in some cases, even as little as a few hours)” but it would be REALLY helpful for guidance

Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-04

Hi Everyone, Coauthor of draft-bartle-tls-deprecate-ffdhe here (the document is undergoing reorganization, and the work-in-progress state can be found here

Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-04

Here’s a quick reminder to those who have not reviewed the document yet, there’s still a few days until the WGLC deadline. Thanks to those who already responded with comments, and we are looking forward to more. Best,    Yaron  On 12/7/21, 15:00, "Valery Smyslov" wrote:Hi, this message