[USRP-users] Re: Creating TX usrp and RX usrp objects using Two different threads using X310

2023-06-08 Thread Leon Wabeke
Hi Eesa I am not sure if this will help, but in some of our code where we reuse the USRP in another thread, I only create the handle once and pass that to both threads (instead of calling multi_usrp::make in each thread), something like: uhd::usrp::multi_usrp::sptr pUSRP = uhd::usrp::multi_usrp:

[USRP-users] Re: x410 TX issues

2023-06-08 Thread jmaloyan
I had customized RFDC IP block in the past, but I have re-installed UHD since to try and resolve this transmit issue. I had just compiled it with the default settings, except for my custom yml file and custom block. The only difference is when I run with vs without the GUI option, without transm

[USRP-users] Re: Creating TX usrp and RX usrp objects using Two different threads using X310

2023-06-08 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 08/06/2023 07:16, Leon Wabeke wrote: Hi Eesa I am not sure if this will help, but in some of our code where we reuse the USRP in another thread, I only create the handle once and pass that to both threads (instead of calling multi_usrp::make in each thread), something like: |uhd::usrp::

[USRP-users] Re: N321 LO Distribution

2023-06-08 Thread Michael Toussaint
Hi Rob, Yes, 0.57 degrees is definitely within my measurement error. But, shouldn't the N321 synchronize the phase of the LO's too? Is there documentation available of how to repeat the results in the "Measured Performance" section of https://kb.ettus.com/USRP_N320/N321_LO_Distribution (e.g. code

[USRP-users] Re: N321 LO Distribution

2023-06-08 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 08/06/2023 21:41, Michael Toussaint wrote: Hi Rob, Yes, 0.57 degrees is definitely within my measurement error. But, shouldn't the N321 synchronize the phase of the LO's too? If you're sharing LOs, there's no "synchronizing the LOs".  A single LO is shared through a switching matrix to each