Hi,
Can anyone share a sample GNU Radio flowgraph or .py for the case of connecting
USRP to PCIe with several 10GbE link. I am trying to send and receive to USRP
through more than one 10GbE link. my PCIe has four 10GbE link. thank you.
___
USRP-users m
On 03/05/2023 08:57, h57jaf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone share a sample GNU Radio flowgraph or .py for the case of
connecting USRP to PCIe with several 10GbE link. I am trying to send
and receive to USRP through more than one 10GbE link. my PCIe has four
10GbE link. thank you.
_
On 03/05/2023 13:05, david.fernan...@viveris.fr wrote:
Hi Marcus,
I have tested downgrading UHD to 3.15 and it works ! (I’ve tried with
UHD 4.4 as well but its doesn’t work)
Now that the reception works everytime in a full-duplex communication,
I observe that the TX/Rx antenna creates a lot
Hello,
\
I currently have a custom RFNOC module. When I try to initialize my block
however, I am unable to find it. I get an error that seems to match up with the
block id I set on my module, but it still seems that it cannot be found. This
is the error that is shown…
`[WARNING] [RFNOC::BLOCK_
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:07 PM wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I currently have a custom RFNOC module. When I try to initialize my block
> however, I am unable to find it. I get an error that seems to match up with
> the block id I set on my module, but it still seems that it cannot be
> found. This is the
This is the output of uhd_usrp_probe
/
| Device: N300-Series Device
| _
|/
| | Mboard: ni-n3xx-3255102
| | dboard_0_pid: 338
| | dboard_0_serial: 3252A17
| | dboard_1_pid: 338
| | dboard_1_serial: 325
Try doing:
uhd_usrp_probe --interactive-ref-iface 0/Block#0
And inside there, try:
peek32 0
What does it print out? Does it match your NOC_ID in your controller?
Brian
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 4:03 PM wrote:
> This is the output of uhd_usrp_probe
>
>
> /
>
> | Device: N300-Series Device
Mistype:
uhd_usrp_probe --interactive-reg-iface 0/Block#0
... also assuming 0/Block#0 and 0/Block#1 are the same and your own custom
blocks.
Unsure if this assumption is correct.
Brian
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 4:21 PM Brian Padalino wrote:
> Try doing:
>
> uhd_usrp_probe --interactive-ref-